Mark Ellis Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 2 hours ago, andym said: Are we absolutely sure that was the case, Mark? Some drawings or interior photos would be really helpful. Andy As well as what David said, I shared a screenshot on Page 1 of the area next to the driver being flat plate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wally dugan Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 (edited) The fate of the FV402 and FV421 is well documented all but 00 CA 25 whose fate is not documented after 1/4/64 when it was sent to RARDE LANGHURST and 00 CA 31 which went to VICKERS NEWCASTLE AS to the M113 it was given the ERM 00 DC 51 the 432 story is in the files along with the drawings in storage thou some information is still here with me Edited January 1 by wally dugan numbers wrong way round Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10FM68 Posted January 1 Share Posted January 1 Here's the M113 with a Scorpion turret. If I remember rightly, this subject cropped up on here a few months back. Soth is photo may well have been provided by another member. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wally dugan Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 (edited) First the M113 FVRDE had two one 00 DC 51 and a second one wing number 8237 this fitted with GREEN ARCHER ERM 00 FE 01 the FV 432 wing number 6453 ERM 03 DA 04 was also fitted with it. Water obstacle the land rover APGP grounded on the entry slope was one of two a FVRDE ERM 637 ELM and 638 ELM 638 ELM was in Canada at the time of the trial so that leaves 637 ELM wing number6566 Edited January 2 by wally dugan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarland Posted January 2 Author Share Posted January 2 @wally dugan when were the M113's at the FVDRE?? The Australians put Saladin turrets on M113's in Vietnam in 1971 - see Paul Handels website http://anzacsteel.hobbyvista.com/Armoured Vehicles/m113a1fsvph_1.htm The saladin turret was later replaced by the scorpion equivalent - I wonder if this was before the FVDRE work with the vehicle shown..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wally dugan Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Two M113s 00FE01 left 1972 00DC51 was transferred 1969 to SHRIVENAM in what guise it does not indicate there are no more details but it left FVRDE there may be more but if it is it's with the others in storage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10FM68 Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 (edited) --DC-- is the ERM for 60/61. As discussed on another thread, there were also the fourteen M113s from Israel used in Afghanistan with the Exactor missile system but that was very much later - their ERMs were KM which were miscellaneous vehicles so difficult to age. --FE-- would be 1971/72. T he attached photo of 00DC51 - also from a previous thread, suggests that it was taken in a 'museum environment' of some sort, so probably at RMCS after its time with FVRDE and the turret is no longer there. Edited January 2 by 10FM68 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirhc Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Ellis Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 Woolwich Woolich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wally dugan Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 there were 16 FV 432 numbered with the W From one to sixteen number W one was 03 DA 17 establishment number6457 after trials at FVRDE it was sent to PEE SHOEBURYNESS on the 23/2/66 THE early ones with P prefix had civil numbers 429 ALR/157 BXR/216 BXR P3 did not have a civilian number 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarland Posted January 7 Author Share Posted January 7 (edited) On 12/30/2023 at 7:20 PM, 10FM68 said: And the M113 1/2 is registered 50BT05 in Aug - Oct 1966 so, presumably, was with FVRDE long enough to be registered and under trials 2 years later than the Horsea Island tests of June 64. Same vehicle in the Littlefield collection?? - results of the 2014 Auction https://rmsothebys.com/en/auctions/lc14/the-littlefield-collection/lots/r0005-fmc-armored-command-recon-vehicle-lynx/574232 You can just make out the reg number and it does look like it ends 05...... (it also doesnt have the commanders cupola so would match up with the FVDRE photos) Also a prototype M113-1/2? https://rmsothebys.com/en/auctions/lc14/the-littlefield-collection/lots/r0073-fmc-armored-command-recon-vehicle-lynx/574516 Prototype M113 IFV's https://rmsothebys.com/en/auctions/lc14/the-littlefield-collection/lots/r0045-aifv-dsid-0001-prototype/574184 https://rmsothebys.com/en/auctions/lc14/the-littlefield-collection/lots/r0047-aifv-demo-1-prototype/574490 Edited January 7 by Tarland 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarland Posted January 7 Author Share Posted January 7 On 12/30/2023 at 10:54 AM, wally dugan said: After a bit more digging l would like to add the following P1 was number W4 and numbered 06 EB 04 and was transferred to SEME on the 27/7/68 P2 was number W3 and renumbered 06 EB 03 and transferred to RMSC SHRIVENAM on the 8/9/69 W2 06 EB 02 was first sent to the RAC CENTRE BOVINGTON on the 6/4/67 and transferred to REME APPRENTICE SCHOOL ARBORFIELD on the 3/12 71 last 06 EB 01 was sent to 10 AVD date not published It would appear that more FV 421 were built than FV 437 There is a lot more to the story of the FV 400 series than you may first think and it began as early as 1950 Wally, do we know how many of the 431 load carriers were built? We know that FV437 06 EB 01 is converted from one of these vehicles. There is a load carrier photographed as a range target in Rob Griffins Pen and Sword book on the FV430 series (not a great publication - has the feel of being thrown together on a Friday afternoon). Theres no visible/legible markings on the photos. From the Chatham photos the FV437 at the RE museum is definitely built from a load carrier given the spacing of the wheel stations. So is this 06 EB 01 heavily modified/stripped of its original fittings....? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wally dugan Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 I am on my way out so will look when l get back tomorrow is fifty nine years when l started working for a living so l am going to take the family out 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wally dugan Posted January 7 Share Posted January 7 to answer the question on FV 437 the records only show clearly two 06 EB 03 P2/W3 and 02 EB 04 P2/ W4 As to FV 431 six are listed 06 EB 01 WAS TRANSFERED to a CENTRAL VEHICLE DEPOT on 27/7/65 I need to find it's location as it is a new one to me and may give a bit more history Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wally dugan Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 To day has been a day of waiting for deliveries so a chance to look for more on the FV400 series it's strange that you read some thing in a book written by a [expert] that you know to be wrong or read something else were l gave up years ago at trying to point out the mistakes because all you get is grief . The story of the FV400 is a case in question the more l dig the more l am puzzled any way here is a bit of the story the trials for suitable recovery trailer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wally dugan Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 I wanted to know more on the history of the FV400 series so l asked a friend if he had any information and received some more to add to what l already had he too had spent time there at FVRDE in past Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarland Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 On 12/28/2023 at 5:40 PM, Mark Ellis said: There's a number of Prototype vehicles that have been given to these "Civilian" military museums, and volunteers have caused more harm than good. The Stalwart went through 3 changes before they settled on the production marine propulsion design. I'd wondered if the round bits were inside the rectangular outlets. I'll see if someone can pop over and get some close up photos of the vehicle. Perhaps @wally dugan has something on the development of the FV437. I'd presumed that the rectangular box around the top was part of a shallow crew area. The winch comes out the front right at the bottom, so not sure where the winch is housed, but the REME 432 had a winch in the middle of the personnel area Stalwart PV2, with the outlet on the side of the hull Prototype Revised Water deflector board trial vehicle - 02SP43 at Beverly 02SP43 at Aldershot museum, after a volunteer apparently removed "the wrong" splashboard Stolly footage courtesy of Mr Hewes on Youtube - apparently these are away to be restored Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Ellis Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 I've received the following from the RE museum today Good afternoon Mark, I have checked our records and can confirm that we no longer have the FV437. Unfortunately, there is no paperwork associated with it, though I did speak to several colleagues who have worked here for considerable time and they do not have memory of the vehicle being in the collection, so it would have been many years ago. You also requested any information on the FV432. This is the information from the catalogue and display that we have; unfortunately there is no paperwork associated with this vehicle: 200708.2: An FV432 Armoured Personnel Carrier (APC) and Bar Mine Layer; fitted with bar mine layer (trailer) and ranger (roof) mine laying systems. On the roof is a Ranger anti-personnel mine-laying system. This rapidly throws down mines to prevent the passage of enemy troops. It could scatter 1296 mines in under six minutes. The APC tows a Barmine layer; these are mines designed to disable enemy tanks. It could lay around 700 per hour. Engine: Rolls-Royce K60 multi-fuel It would have been used in Germany (BAOR) but also in the Gulf War. Mines: L9 Anti-Tank Barmine, L10 Anti-Personnel Mine Weight: 15 tons Crew: 2 plus passengers Speed: 32 mph (unladen) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.