Jack Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 So tell me the correct term/grammar is it WW2, WW11 or World War Two.....:confused: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtistsRifles Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 As I understand it Jack - any and either are accurate. "World War Two" is the correct long form, "World War 2" is an acceptable alternative whilst "WW2" or "WWII" are acceptable abbreviations Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodge Deep Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 Not forgetting The Second World War Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marmite!! Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 Not forgetting The Second World War That's not fair... Jack's confused enough as it is.... :coffee: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtistsRifles Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 Comes of spending too much time polishing a certain plank!!!!! :rofl::rofl::rofl: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony B Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 The 'War' was 1914/18 during the 1920's it became known as the 'Great War' when conflict broke out in 1939 it was the 'Second War' during this time the 'Great War' became the 'First World War' it was in 1945 that the 'Second War' became the 'Second World War' in UK, 'World War Two' in U.S.A., who then also adopted 'World war One' WW1 WW2 are acepted abrivations. I mean what's complicated about that? :whistle: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fv1609 Posted September 16, 2008 Share Posted September 16, 2008 I've noticed quite a few things written immediately after WW2 refer to it as Hitler's War. But that term doesn't get used nowadays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony B Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 That makes you wonder whose name may eventually get attached to modern conflicts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianScottish Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 Just to muddy the waters, don't forget that the Russians refer to it as "The Great Patriotic War" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony B Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 Don't the Finns call it the 'Continuation War' ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andreadavide Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 Imagine us Italians fighting three wars in one: 1940-1943 With the Germans and Japanes against The Rest Of The World 1943-1945 Southern Italy pretending to fight together with The Rest Of The World against the Germans 1943-1945 Northern Italy pretending to fight together with the Germans against The Rest Of The World... Andrea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snapper Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 I'm assuming this is a correct nomenclature question. World War 2; World War Two and World War II (with Roman numerals) are fine - but please not World War 11, which is a nightmare prospect. Second World War is also fine and is more British. In the UK, the use of World War 2; which is an Americanism, has more or less beaten off Second World War. The First World War; 1st World War; World War 1; World War One - always sounds and looks much better as the Great War. That is what it was to the men who fought it. The sequel is a wholly different matter. MB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snapper Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 Just to muddy the waters, don't forget that the Russians refer to it as "The Great Patriotic War" Not strictly true. The names for it changed with progressive regimes and regionally. The Great Patriotic War tag is not dissimilar in terms of usage to Wermacht for the German army of WW2, which was always the Heer, and still is. The bigger question, when you've prepared the coffee and biscuits, is whether any of this matters. For written style the forum it does not. In the magazine/review bit at the front it does. One house style is essential. This I was taught at journo school twenty-eight years ago. :-D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony B Posted September 17, 2008 Share Posted September 17, 2008 Not strictly true. The names for it changed with progressive regimes and regionally. The Great Patriotic War tag is not dissimilar in terms of usage to Wermacht for the German army of WW2, which was always the Heer, and still is. The bigger question, when you've prepared the coffee and biscuits, is whether any of this matters. For written style the forum it does not. In the magazine/review bit at the front it does. One house style is essential. This I was taught at journo school twenty-eight years ago. :-D From the man who jumped all over me and made me write out numbers! :shake: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snapper Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 :box: Have I hurt your feelings, TB? I am confused. I am happy to use an abbreviation WW2 in a forum setting; but being a effing know-all, I try to be consistent in other matters wordish in the reviews and stuff because I'm not much good at anything else - (pens, yes, spanners, no). It inflates my importance and makes up for a lack of planks. Might explain why :-D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony B Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 :box: Have I hurt your feelings, TB? I am confused. I am happy to use an abbreviation WW2 in a forum setting; but being a effing know-all, I try to be consistent in other matters wordish in the reviews and stuff because I'm not much good at anything else - (pens, yes, spanners, no). It inflates my importance and makes up for a lack of planks. Might explain why :-D No hard feelings :-D keeps me on the literary staright and narrow. (About the spell checker AGAIN!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.