antarmike Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 (edited) After 38 years good service Nimrod flew for the last time today, with a farewell flypast at RAF Waddington, its home base. Although very capable, and although it has a job to do in present ongoing conflicts, and despite the fact a replacement will not be flying until 2014, the Nimrod is forced into retirement. Although I could not get along today, I saw Nimrod overfly Conningsby (on its way back from the Middle east???), to Waddington yesterday. I hope this doesn't come round to bite us in the Arse in the same way, having no Harrier and no Ark Royal is hampering what we can achieve in the middle east right now. Farewell Nimrod. What a pity they couldn't keep in the air a few days longer so the Public could also say goodbye at the Waddington airshow! Edited June 29, 2011 by antarmike Quote
Zero-Five-Two Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 Saw it on the news at lunchtime today. Saddened by its demise, but totally confused at how the powers that be can justify it when there is no current replacement. Funny how the planned replacement is american machine, and while we are waiting for it we can cadge a seat on a passing american plane. We truly are becoming the 53rd state Quote
ArtistsRifles Posted June 28, 2011 Posted June 28, 2011 The more cynical amongst us might be tempted to draw a line between this and the recent appearance of the obamarama road show over here..... Whats next I wonder - scrapping the Challenger 2 and having to rely on US Abrams?? Quote
Jon8910 Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 I was at the finale event, having worked on the R1’s until recently. I’m not going to enter into the replacement debate; I’ve heard enough of all that over the past 3 years and became a victim of the decision. Here’s a couple of pics from the event, of XV249, which incidentally is a hybrid R1 having started life as an MR2 and converted to R1 to replace XW666 ‘The Beast’ which was very skillfully ditched into the Moray Firth back in 1995 after an engine/wing fire during an airtest. One of the R1’s will be on static display at this weekend’s airshow. Bye bye Mighty Hunter :cry:. Quote
kevin royan Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 As we stay very close to RAF Kinloss it is very sad to see them go,the base will now close and alot of jobs will go.We were down on the base when they cut up the last 4.There is a local group up here trying to save the last one,but the MOD is throwing alot of red tape in there way. Quote
chevpol Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 Saw it on the news at lunchtime today. Saddened by its demise, but totally confused at how the powers that be can justify it when there is no current replacement. Funny how the planned replacement is american machine, and while we are waiting for it we can cadge a seat on a passing american plane. We truly are becoming the 53rd state If we do become the 53rd state, does that mean we get cheap petrol? Mark Quote
Jon8910 Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 The final, final flight has just taken place of the Nimrod R1 with the spirited departure of 49 for Kemble, where it will be dismantled and transported to Cosford Museum, this follows 64 which flew into East Midlands for the Aeropark recently, 65 is currently being cut up for scrap in a hangar. Quote
Pzkpfw-e Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Here's the replacement, such a modern design & airframe! Quote
RattlesnakeBob Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 I'm not even gonna comment on this thread..:-|.......hahah!...apart from writing this bit that is!... ..because......... the last time I commented on our Governements (ahem!) "strange behaviour & attitude" over such things... ... I was told off by the 'powers that be' for being too 'political' ...:cool2: Quote
mike65 Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Is it just me or have we forgotten how to make things these days. Take a modern aircraft, stick lots of bulges and stuff in it looks terrible. Take a Comet ad lots of extra bulges and stuff and it still looks good. Even when they had big noses. Probably just me, better book a new opticians appointment:D Mike Quote
Paul Drake Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Nimrod was indeed a fine looking aircraft. I think the replacement ought to be some Gannets borrowed from museums. to go with the build up in our Territorial Forces. Quote
Pzkpfw-e Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Take a modern aircraft, stick lots of bulges and stuff in it looks terrible.Mike A Rivet Joint, modern? It's about as ancient an airframe as the Nimrod! Quote
Jon8910 Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 Quite right Pzkpfw-e, the B707 was designed in 1954. The RC135 Rivet Joints have already been around the clock. Twenty USAF Rivet Joints are being refurbished and refitted, the RAF is having three of those, calling them 'Airseeker'. Supposedly cheaper than using three Nimrod MR4's... Really :cheesy: Quote
Tony B Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 Quite right Pzkpfw-e, the B707 was designed in 1954. The RC135 Rivet Joints have already been around the clock. Twenty USAF Rivet Joints are being refurbished and refitted, the RAF is having three of those, calling them 'Airseeker'. Supposedly cheaper than using three Nimrod MR4's... Really :cheesy: Yeah, bankrupt stock! Shackalton! Where are you when needed? Quote
mike65 Posted August 1, 2011 Posted August 1, 2011 A Rivet Joint, modern? It's about as ancient an airframe as the Nimrod! Quite right Pzkpfw-e, the B707 was designed in 1954. The RC135 Rivet Joints have already been around the clock. Twenty USAF Rivet Joints are being refurbished and refitted, the RAF is having three of those, calling them 'Airseeker'. Supposedly cheaper than using three Nimrod MR4's... Really :cheesy: Ok so it is also an old airframe. But it is still ugly. What happened to making aircraft attractive? Mike Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.