Jump to content

30 Nov 1917


LeeEnfield

Recommended Posts

The German tactic was 'instant counterattack' throughout the war, hence the Britsh take it, the German's take it back. The tactic did have negative results though. Britian having the 'Dominions' and the US being fresh into the war at that time had much higher reserves of man power. For every casualty the Germans suffred the Allies could afford 5 or 10. That's what a war of attrition comes down to. :dunno:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Difference in approach. The German's looked upon occupied territory as a bargaining chip at any Peace conference. The Allies looked on trenches as a temporary necessity before getting the German's out. Also the German's stopped their advance on the strategic high ground. The intention was if we can't win outright we will wear the Allies down. Evidence is that the Kaiser was as paranoid as Hitler. Also the German's had national service, all German males had compulsory military service. The British army started litterally from scratch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, the german army seemed to be able to opperate and react much quicker than those of the allied forces, in both world wars,......well, in wwii up to the hitler bomb plot, anyways.

 

 

To the Germans, immediate counterattack has always been an SOP. To the Allies, "Expect an immediate German counterattack" therefore became an SOP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...