Jump to content

Salamanders of the Army Fire Service


Mark Ellis

Recommended Posts

Would anyone know how many Salamanders the AFS had?

And come to that, what evidence is there of numbers held by RAF? Did the RNAS have any?

The only Army Salamander that I've ever seen is 52EK60, in NI role with water canon. But this first image shows it as a AFS fire engine. 

I also note that the tail end is square, compared to the RAF version being rounded.Army52EK604.thumb.jpg.fe4b1518b1f91546a752e37e1059047d.jpg 

ArmySalamander52EK602.jpg.48db2029040b0a82d88ec330f2a3bfac.jpg

 

ArmySalamander52EK603.thumb.jpg.3fba2ced550c87b688a294216fedd974.jpg

 

ArmySalamander52EK604.jpg.e9d645bfe3abf86a650fbf1fde44320c.jpg

 

An RAF Crash

Camion-6.thumb.JPG.12585130b56fb628d5e8d7dd764c9c09.JPG

 

It's also suggested that the RAF driver training vehicles had the number F.V. 653. Any evidence of that? 

Many thanks

Camion-5.jpg.9de31a89a4b191ae14f40ff6fb3b40fb.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, fv1609 said:

52EK60x.jpg.a78ade72568854fb2bcd1d267b2359f5.jpg

Asset Code 2455-0065

Contract No. FV2522
If you google that you will just get Adidas golf shoes : (

Sadly, they appear to have been sold off around 1978, 8 years before Merlin was started, otherwise we'd have more info.
I'm still trying to find evidence of the 651, 652, 653 variants.
I do wonder if the 651 is the first Mk6, and then the 652 is the A - D
This RAF book doesn't give an FV number

 

4576B 2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fv1609 said:

I've got some RAF pages that describe the differences between the Mks have you got that? If not I can scan them.

Some RAF types have offered up various things, and I've edited some pages that I found online

Does yours look anything like this
https://sites.google.com/view/alvis-stalwart-hmlc-files/alvis-salamander-crash-tender?authuser=0#h.shg8vqdstfll 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That FV 652 that appears in 1962 & 1966 catalogues appears in the 1956 catalogue as FV 651(A) with the same photo & description. There is also basic chassis catalogued.

IMG_20230830_192030.thumb.jpg.e0169eedb8681c88079a2c1f2da42078.jpg

IMG_20230830_192113.thumb.jpg.0f6e942b098719219824e2d25fe988b3.jpg

The 1954 catalogue shows an even earlier version as FV 6001

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 @fv1609 Thanks for this, Clive. All adds to the history/development, which is where my own interest lies.

Is the basic chassis a separate entry? Alvis seeing what else it could be used for. Hadn't realise that FV651 was also a private venture, according to an Alvis brochure that I'm retyping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As time went on these catalogues became less frequent, I think I have them all. As far as Salamander goes:

1954 Nothing
1956 Two exhibits FV 651(A) complete vehicle & the chassis
1962 Runway Surface Friction Test Vehicle (no FV no.) & FV652
1966 You have this
1971 Nothing
1981 FV652

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, fv1609 said:

As time went on these catalogues became less frequent, I think I have them all. As far as Salamander goes:

1954 Nothing
1956 Two exhibits FV 651(A) complete vehicle & the chassis
1962 Runway Surface Friction Test Vehicle (no FV no.) & FV652
1966 You have this
1971 Nothing
1981 FV652

 

I think they were out of service with the RAF by 78. Interesting that they're in the 81 book

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, wally dugan said:

That looks like the TILT PLATFORM at MVEE CHRISTCHURCH there is no establishment number  to be seen so it would be hard to find any information

Thanks for that, Wally

As I understand it, Alvis got Coach builders Alfred Miles to put a basic body on the new Salamander chassis, and Pyrene to put some fire fighting gear in it, and showed it to FVRDE. Willie Dunn of course had a close relationship with FVRDE, having helped them with the 6x6 punt hull concept (Magazine article by his son confirms this. His son, Mike designed the Stalwart Mark 2).
FVRDE liked the concept, gave it the number FV6001 - and Alvis's Salamander chassis got the green light for fire engine manufacturers to put their bodies and fire gear on - to the RAF Mark 6 fire engine spec.

Prototype1.jpg.59bbc606cc65c0d1af89382e71528965.jpg

Is there absolutely any evidence of Foamite submitting their version to FVRDE? Foamite appear to have made 5 or 7 for South Africa, but the bulk of the Salamanders have Pyrene bodies on them.

 

Foamitearticle.jpg.2c0d741229395650e0bd8132851d8a39.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, wally dugan said:

In this case there is no starting point for me  to start looking

But then there's this - from 1962

 

Foamite Ltd., Victoria Road, Feltham, Middlesex, recently obtained the order to design and develop an entirely new light crash rescue truck for the Royal Air Force. The prototype passed all rough‐driving tests at Fighting Vehicles Research and Development Establishment and operational tests and a production contract was awarded by the Ministry of Aviation.

Citation

(1962), "Auxiliary Equipment", Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 29-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb033511

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mark this how it works if a prototype vehicle went under tests it would have one of the following or even two a P prefix a SP NUMBER a service number a civilian number and or ESTABLISHMENT number any of these with this l can start also vehicles  tested at CHRISTCHURCH some times went with none of these only to receive its' identity on return to FVRDE . There are hundreds of items listed in the ledgers in no order or type and in some case's not in date order

Edited by wally dugan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, wally dugan said:

Mark this how it works if a prototype vehicle went under tests it would have one of the following or even two a P prefix a SP NUMBER a service number a civilian number and or ESTABLISHMENT number any of these with this l can start also vehicles  tested at CHRISTCHURCH some times went with none of these only to receive its' identity on return to FVRDE . There are hundreds of items listed in the ledgers in no order or type and in some case's not in date order

Sorry for the late reply, @wally dugan

I get that if vehicles are submitted for trials under a requested Specification, then they get a trial wing number and are "Trialled to death".

But what happens when a known person or company says "Take a look at this for the day, and tell us what you think?" According to Alvis's Salamander brochure, the 6x6 fire truck was a private venture, the same as the Stalwart was.

I've only ever seen the one Salamander with what I think is a Miles body, and wonder if Alvis waved it under FVRDE's nose. There must have been something for it to get the FV6001 number, and go into the catalogue, I guess.


I don't have any Salamander wing numbers, but I have all these Stalwart "bits", which I've put on a spreadsheet. Excel sheet and PDF of the same as this image attached. Would be really appreciated if you had the time to take a look and fill in the blanks, please.

Many thanks

image.thumb.png.fe2cd36e30280d89d6b0b141f6f53e9d.png

Stalwart wing numbers.xlsx Stalwart-Chassis-Number.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here's some to go on with 24 EK 07 / 7045  24 EK 0O / 7068    24 EK O9 /7047 24 EK 69 7242 / PV 10 WAS THE COACHMAN on the subject of the FV 651 Chassis only there were two registration number  23 AC 63 / 5453 AND   23 AG 84 /5622   THE AC  one may be a error  and should be  AG will sort out the others but suffering with grit in left eye

Edited by wally dugan
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for this, Wally. Hope the eye flushes out ok, one of my pet hates is grit in the eye.

I thought 22AG54 might be in there as a trial vehicle.

I also forgot 03EM79, which is mentioned in trial reports. Trial Report 101620 Jan-June 1964 (Mk1 Stalwart 03EM79)

Many thanks

22AG542.thumb.jpg.3d47a13a1d8118053fce302d92438d74.jpg22AG54.jpg.5924af6853a04f2b20925f8bfdc1948e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wally dugan said:

...

 PV 10 WAS THE COACHMAN

...

Does "THE COACHMAN" mean a model name, as in FV622 The Coachman - as in it was fitted with a canopy from factory. It's the only in service Stalwart that had a canopy - if you ignore all the REME 624s that had been modified in the field.

 

PV-10-4.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...