Jump to content

Ron

Members
  • Posts

    3,432
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    38

Everything posted by Ron

  1. Demon, these Enfield's leave a bit to be desired with the space between the clutch and the gearbox. Anything out of line or bent frame and the rear chain can rub on the back of the chain case or the clutch can rub on the inside of the case. There appears to be a bodge repair to yours. It should look like this I think. There is no bush or spacer behind the clutch hub. It's well worth spending some time fettling/adjusting the bottom bracket and spacer tube so that the inner case is clear of both rear chain and clutch, before you do the final fitting. Ron
  2. The spindle sizes are 7/16" at the front 9/16" at the back. Personally I'd steer clear of the Indian stuff. Ron
  3. I viewed this (or it's twin sister) back in the 90's. It was laying in a fisherman's yard up an alley on the edge of Holes Bay in Poole. It was very unloved and covered in junk. I decided to leave it where it was. It must be gone from there now as the whole area has been redeveloped. Ron (Poole)
  4. Ron

    My latest project

    And here is the oil tank cum air filter that Jan made after I've painted it and added the correct transfer. Also the other side with the original tool box. Again there will have to follow an interlude whilst I claim the rest of the Miller dynomag parts from the eccentric guy who has them and also wait for them to be refurbed. Ron
  5. Fabulous! Thank you very much Nick. I have a reasonable collection of vehicles and especially motorcycles. My theme is and has always been 'British Forces WW2' and I'd hate for a Yanky vehicle to have crept in. Even my Indian motocycle is ex British forces. I'll PM you as soon as I get a result from that link you posted. Regards Ron
  6. Thanks again Wally. It least it looks like I have the correct badge on the front of my Tilly (Austin) Ha Ha! Nick I await your findings in the hope of proving it's genuine ex British army. Ron
  7. Thanks Wally. Mine is indeed an Austin Tilly. But my number 00 RA 25 seems to fall before the sequence you posted? Ron
  8. Interesting! I've owned my own Jeep for over 30 years and it came to me as an ex British Jeep (Butler lamps etc). But I've never checked it out. It is chassis number 159838 and I've kept the same bonnet census number that it came with 5474235. It has a Ford tub fitted, but no post war army rebuild plate. My Tilly however still has it's rebuild plate which states it's post war number was 00 RA 25. Regards Ron
  9. Coincidentally I have been talking to another guy from Yeovil who also thought he had a military AJS. However, his has all the correct Matchless numbers. Someone has simply fitted an AJS timing cover and mounted the mag at the front. The bike was painted black over the army green and AJS stickers attached to the tank. At first he was disappointed by the news, but now he's got excited about owning a WD bike and has already re-painted it to military spec. I'm also helping to research his late Dad's old 7th Somerset Light Infantry markings (43rd Wessex div) so that he can pay tribute in June this year. I believe he'll be looking for the correct timing side at some point. Ron
  10. The engine number is stamped 41 (1941). What do you mean by fins? Is it the support webs around the drive side main bearings? Ron
  11. Yes got the PM. I'm sure I can see where a frame number has been sanded off on the N/S headstock. Ron
  12. There where really no AJS's supplied under WO contracts, but quite a lot of impressed civy AJ's. (3 have been through my hands). I have the parts list with frame/eng numbers. If you want to PM me your numbers I'll have a look. The black colour would have no bearing on RAF. Ron PS. not sure what you mean about "No frame serial number" They all had frame numbers from the factories.
  13. Ron

    My latest project

    Still the frame was not quite right, so some more cutting and welding has been done. The front frame has now been stretch up by the required 1 1/2". The tank tube has been lengthened by 1 1/4" and the rear frame has been suitably altered to fit, and all re-painted. I've started the build up again but I know I'll be held up to some degree by the refurbishment of the Miller magneto and dynamo.(I'm still waiting for the dynamo to arrive). I'm really chuffed to have found these items but the old guy I'm dealing with is a bit eccentric to say the least. Jan is doing a marvellous job of making the unique oil tank come air filter. Hopefully he'll post some pictures of his workmanship. Ron
  14. Ron

    My latest project

    Hi again Kostas. Jan is on the case regarding the oil tank and will have a go at making one after I've confirmed the size of the available space to fit it in. First got to tidy up and re-spray the frame. Ron
  15. Ron

    My latest project

    And now the frame is back. So time to start all over again. Ron
  16. Ron

    My latest project

    Hello Kostas? Well I built the bike up before I'd realised that the frame on this experimental bike had also been modified. But since I was going through the DVLA registration procedure with imminent inspection I had to put the project temporarily on hold. Inspection completed and registration received so I've now totally stripped the bike again and the frame is with my engineer for some modifications to make it about 1 1/2" taller. (Then the rear part will have to be tweaked also). In the mean time, I've been on the hunt for a 'Miller' Dynomag. I got back from a full day trip to London yesterday with a mag (dynamo to follow by post). I've also acquired a Miller 35E tail lamp and correct head lamp to which I've added a medallion badge. I just need the frame to be sorted before I can crack on again. Ron
  17. I've only ever used straight 50 in mine, although my 'G' box leaks a bit and I've been adding straight 90. But it hasn't helped much and I'm reluctant to touch the box until I'm ready or have to, as it's such a sweet box. I would perhaps throw in a couple of handfuls of grease while it's open and then top up with oil through the filler neck. There's this stuff from Hitchcocks. http://www.hitchcocksmotorcycles.com/accessory-tools-silkolene#part_4110 Ron
  18. I'm quite sure you will have to remove it from the frame if you're going to replace the important bearing. I would fit a sealed bearing and just remove the inner seal for a leak free gearbox. Ron
  19. I don't know anything about that unit other than what is on google, but coincidently this just turned up on ebay. I don't know how genuine it is? He says it's ex WD, which is written in the log book.......Under 'Model'?? and in a different pen?? Who knows? Lots of bids though! Ron http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/201540310627?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
  20. Well I would say that the clues indicate it comes from contract C5108 which was for 3300 bikes and that engine number 27161 is only 445 away from the only indicated number 27606. I have seen at least three 'impressed' AJS's with the census number stamped on the crankcase like this one below. So perhaps it was the done thing with those early bikes? Ron
  21. No, it's the same principal as a push bike. As you turn the top fixing it draws a cone up the inside of the handlebar stem. The stem has slots in it, so you effectively expand the stem to lock it inside the frame headstock. Sometimes a bugger to move the handlebar which has been locked in the same position for a number of years and got rusty inside. Ron
  22. I agree Malcolm. If you re-timed the valves without moving the mag pinion and engine, the ign timing should be as it was before. Assuming it was set correctly in the first place? These are best set statically as per the book. I'll be interested to hear if you get it running nicely. Sometimes it's just down to dirty fuel and/or plugs. Regards Ron
  23. OK Malcolm, I don't know if calculating the size of the gears will work like that? I don't have a TRW in my collection, all my bikes are WW2. But I have Velocett's and I only mention these Velo's because they are unusual as they also have the odd number of teeth on the timing gear and those same auto advance units, and from memory it's something like 79 revolutions before the dots line up again. You could recheck this if you pull the cover off again. Regarding the ignition timing. On my side valve singles there is always a removable plug over the piston crown to put a gauge in to check the timing. Something like a drinking straw marked at TDC and then in your case 1/8" further up for the point were the CB points just start to break. Of course you would have to removing the cover to hold the auto advance unit at full advance. Again apart from my Velocett's all mine have a manual advance handlebar lever. It's a shame if the manual doesn't give the piston position at full retard as well. On the Velo's they quote (from memory) something like 7/16" BTDC full advance or TDC at full retard. Also not a major job if you have to take the head off to check it properly. I gather from friends who ride TRW's that they are sweet smooth rides! Ron
  24. Malcolm I've been following your Carrier problems and you obviously understand engines. But here you have fallen into the trap of starting something without the aid of a workshop manual! Here is a link to a free download. http://www.scribd.com/doc/22255431/Instruction-Manual-for-TRIUMPH-TRW-Mark-2#scribd I've copied page 15 here (Valve timing). Once you set the timing it will go out of sinc for a good few revolutions due to the odd number of teeth. Very likely you have lost the ignition timing now? I don't think you can blame British bike quality here. Ron (UK)
×
×
  • Create New...