-
Posts
424 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Events
Articles
Store
Downloads
Posts posted by Mark Ellis
-
-
-
On 9/26/2010 at 8:59 PM, stal108 said:
I have had both and would go for a daf gs anyday,
cummins v bedford daf1
5speed v box 4 speed daf2
tilt cab v fixed cam daf3
permenant 4wd v rear selactable 4wd daf4
pas v non pas daf5
Price value??? daf6
looks bedford1
daf faults front tow hitch on a daf is very far back makes it hard to push things with a stright bar as you damage bumpers. as far as bedfords bomb proof em,,, my friend has a mk, first problem was a front oil seal turns out the crank had been damaged took lots of work to sort, it also had water pump, alt ,starter ,transferbox .front prop .fuel pump. it a mint truck not many better but was made on a friday. I gave the daf death worked it hard, old bedfords are not in the same league, The test is drive either 100 mile see how you are??? i bet the daf drive will be quieter faster same easier to drive with pas. As far as what is better its the daf. A bedford is a classic army truck but old.
Um, Lets revive this very old post, and see what the commentors think now of the Leyland DAF v Bedford compared to back in 2010/2012.
But lets just correct some of Stal108's comments- The M type had power steering and 5 speed boxes as an optional extra. People have easily fitted TL power steering to standard M types, as it's all the same gear.
- Bedfords were selectable 2/4 wheel drive, not permanent.
And also mention
- The M type also came as a twin rear wheel at 11,200 kg gross.
- The Early Marshall M type bodies of the 70s are slightly different to the later M type bodies of the 80s. That is to say that the early ones had stowage for the stripped down canopy and superstructure, and the late ones didn't - because they were cheaper to make.
The Bedford multifuel ran on Diesel, Petrol or Aviation fuel, but the tank had to be drained before switching the injector pump over.
See David Bradley's article
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oafJOkhIEb1B9V_hOixPojEUcXUMHyvD/view?usp=sharing- 1
-
-
XW is a London registration. I wonder if it's one of the registrations linked with FVRDE.
GX is a London Registration that was reserved for official use, including FVRDE.
The prototype Saladins by Crossley were RGX reg
https://sites.google.com/view/alvis-stalwart-hmlc-files/development-of-the-punt-hull -
9 hours ago, lowfat said:
Ron is in Australia he has a thread ultimate forward control on Aus Land Rover forum. You have more chance of getting him there
Think I've got his email somewhere
My growing project
https://sites.google.com/view/alvis-stalwart-hmlc-files/ -
51 minutes ago, radiomike7 said:
You do realise that post was was from 9 years ago?
I do, @radiomike7. And ?
-
On 7/8/2014 at 10:45 PM, 101 Ron said:
@101 Ron Ron, which publication is this? Could you scan the Stalwart pages for me please
-
-
I've come across these photos, of a Mk 1 Stalwart, mounted with a GPMG.
It appears to be mounted on the hatch lid, but that could be the angle of the dangle.
So I wondered if @wally dugan is aware of any trials back in the 60s perhaps for the Stalwart to have a gun mount?
-
Asking for a friend.
Does anyone have copies or PDFs of EMERs and manuals for the BV 202E Mk 2, please.
Thanks in advance.
-
-
-
9 minutes ago, attleej said:
Mark,
The system uses capsules of, I suspect, ether rather than ethanol which will not work. I have never known them be used in UK and the MKs always started even in the coldest weather without using the system.
John
John, I've used them myself - 40 years ago in Germany. You're probably right about the contents of the canisters. But still looking for text and images
-
-
On 1/14/2023 at 9:33 AM, john1950 said:
More about weight carrying that cross country ability I would think.
Spreading the weight over more tyres
-
-
-
1 hour ago, XS650 said:
It's an interesting concept which seemed to get some use post war on tippers. see link-
https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/photos/item/JLP01/08/010235
That's an amazing photo of them in use with Laing construction.
Thanks for the link
-
11 minutes ago, wally dugan said:
There is a small piece in Bart Vanderveen's kaleidoscope of BEDFORD & VAUXHALL MILITARY VEHICLES on this l would have posted it but waiting for a new scanner
Thanks Wally,
I'll look forward to that
-
-
Many thanks for the answers, Gentlemen
-
EDIT - Sorted, thank you
Would anyone have an image or manual that shows the full list of the Instrument panel layout for the 1939 Bedford MW?This list only goes up to 9 items, but there are 14 items on the image.
Thanks in advance
-
1 hour ago, 64EK26 said:
Sorry - no but most of them are freely available on the internet just search for "clansman vehicle installation manual". Many of the manuals have been made available due to Freedom of Information requests
Cheers
Richard
Most FOI are for AESP files, rather than WD/Army Code and EMERs. So Stalwarts are usually excluded. Yet to find the basic Clansman harness on an FOI, but will keep searching
-
@64EK26 Richard, that is brilliant. Many thanks for that.
Would you happen to have the B set harness one, and the equivalent manuals for the Clansman at all please?
FV numbers of Bedford trucks
in MV Chatter
Posted
I wonder if anyone has a list of all the FV numbers applied to all Bedford trucks, please?
I know that the RL cargo was
And the M type was
General Service vehicle
The With Winch variants
So I guess the M type CALM version with the Atlas also had a code
But what was the TM 4x4 and TM 6x6 codes, etc
I found an FOI (and lost it again), but it doesn't say which vehicle the codes apply to.
FV13801 TRUCK,CARGO
FV13802 TRUCK,CARGO
FV13803 TRUCK,CARGO
FV13804 TRUCK,CARGO
FV13805 TRUCK,FLATBED
FV13806 TRUCK,FLATBED
FV13807 TRUCK,FLATBED
FV13811 TRUCK,CARGO
FV13812 TRUCK,FLATBED
FV13812J TRUCK,CARGO
FV13815 TRUCK,CARGO
FV13901 TRUCK,CARGO
FV13902 TRUCK,CARGO
FV13903 TRUCK,CARGO
I currently have other FOI in, so can't submit any more.
Many thanks