Jump to content

Mark Ellis

Members
  • Posts

    424
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Mark Ellis

  1. 5 minutes ago, fv1609 said:

    Mark I have EMER WHEELED VEHICLES F 238 Inspection Standards I can photo it BUT it is in fiche which doesn't do well when photoed on a fiche viewer as the centre screen being nearest the bulb gets well illuminated but the peripheral text is poor.

    I see you are after AC 12798 Pt 6 Supp 5 this is on the 19 Set Group site under reference no 677. But there are a few hoops to go through to get it & they may be uneasy about allowing access for general publication as I think they have to abide by some rules set by the RS Museum to control access particulary if it is watermarked by someone else. (I'm just the messenger)

    https://www.royalsignals.org.uk/lark.html

    Thanks for the offer, Clive. I'll leave the the F238 for now, and need to investigate realistic (cost and quality) production from microfiche. Seen some really poor examples that were allegedly done professionally. Sure that someone will loan a hard copy one day. I've done so well with the HMLC manuals.

    Re the 19 set group. I do have a copy of , and despite a conversation of why I wanted the files, they have provided one with my name and personal email splashed all over it. So I've advised members of the HMLC group to ask them directly. Rather oddly, they insist that you use your "paid for" internet provider's email - and I use Vodafone so don't own one. And have no intention of buying one to share files for other people. They also lock the files with a password - for files that are still marked Restricted.
    If the files are owned by the museum, then the museum as a body might be in breach. 
     

    Radio group.jpg

  2. There's a genuine original MK EMER F232 manual on eBay, which covers the Multifuel engine, if anyone is interested.

    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/304708765304

    I've been building up a collection of Military service and maintenance files for the Stolly, and now for the Bedfords. These files being free for anyone to download off my cheap website. I do this to help other people keep these things out of the scrap yards.

    https://sites.google.com/view/alvis-stalwart-hmlc-files

    If anyone does buy the EMER F232, I'd ask that you consider loaning it to me - so that I can scan it and share it with others.

    #BedfordMK

  3. 20 hours ago, paulob1 said:

    wally do you have a copy of the berliet one. I have two of them  and cannot find anything about them in English...

    If you have the French document, what happens if you scan it as a File type PDF (rather than an Image type jpeg PDF), open it in Chrome and ask Chrome to translate it?

  4. @10FM68 Putting a watermark on something doesn't mean copyright - it just stops people selling documents that are freely available.

    All the documents that I've uploaded have all been declassified by MOD. They clearly state on them that they are free to download, and advertise the group. Some people will sell absolutely anything - and I'm not a big fan of that when documents can help to keep old vehicles out of the scrap yard.

    One person is charging for searches on and selling extracts of Merlin, which is freely downloadable off the internet if you know what to look for.


    This sort of damage below is caused by people not being able to get hold of the right documents, or not looking for them because they think they aren't available. And of course of not having a clue of what they're doing without the documents.

    No photo description available.

    • Like 2
  5. 21 hours ago, wally dugan said:

    Sorry for the print on the scanned picture this is done to try and stop some one putting it on another forum as he has done it the past if he continues l will stop posting

    I'm all for watermarking things, so that they can be freely shared - and not be sold on eBay.
    I now have a copy of Master PDF editor, which makes it so easy to mark the whole document.

    image.png.0040e437d9957be09a9ddabecbcfec2d.png


    image.png.90351986c89cb989c399e3a774b64285.png

  6. I should have mentioned this.
    Merlin shows that all the chassis numbers around the Austrian three came into service on 1st July 1967. The previous batch were given on 1st January 1967. 103 Stalwarts were given to the British Army on 1st July 1967, from chassis STAL II/118 to STAL II/271.

    The Austrian three are Stall II/169 or 170, 172 and 175, so would have been made perhaps in early March 1967.

    The German pair of Mk 2 - STAL II/16 and 17 were made in amongst a chassis batch of 17 that were handed over to British Army on 1st July 1966.

    The German pair had higher sides and tail, and if seen, stand out due to the extra hight 

    image.thumb.png.4af7e4284b8b2dddccb1e5963cbff307.png

  7. 3 hours ago, motorfahrer said:

    Could it be that Austria ordered the Stalwarts without costly extras due to the tight budget our army always had?

    motorfahrer

    No. The splashboard would be a part of the basic price. Removing the splashboard made little difference to the visibility, suggesting that it was an ex BAOR vehicle being trialled. 
    Perhaps someone in Austria has better links to the military history, and can find some answers.

  8. @motorfahrer

    This is the photo from the Pioniere Truppen Schule trial. Austria bought chassis number STAL 11 / 169 or 170 (depending on which book you read), 172 and 175 in 1967. Three in total.

    Austrian-trial-2-Mk2.jpg.d3ba8d23984c4312a0d9f7d79dd89b79.jpg

     

    But the other photos of BH 82.196 without the Splash board are much later. BAOR started removing the splash boards and swimming gear in 1982, but many units didn't remove the gear due to the time it takes to do the work. My research shows that only the RCT Stalwarts appear to have had the propulsion systems removed.

  9. @motorfahrer
    I've previously been in communication with Hermann at HKFW. The Stalwart that they have is ex British Forces, to record the vehicles that Austria trialled.
    Hermann told me about the tragic death of a soldier that fell out of the rear louvers in full kit - into the river and drowned. Although, if the rear splashboard was fitted throughout the trial, then it's unclear of how that happened.

    This resulting in Austria disposing of the three, but nobody at the Austrian Army or Government appears to know what happened to them. 

    Austrian-trial-2-Mk2.jpg.d3ba8d23984c4312a0d9f7d79dd89b79.jpg

    But I'm also aware that Austria also trailed them again, possibly in the 80s. This vehicle has the front splash board removed, which is something that we started doing in 83, and stopped due to the time involved to remove the swimming equipment. 

    Is there any way in Austria to see the history of BH 82 136 ?

    Divers-1a-Austria-Mk2.JPG.5a5a27ce832bb5d61ff89f20569ea798.JPG

    Divers-2a-Austria-Mk2.JPG.23f2a74a053bd155724100ff18302eb8.JPG

  10. 39 minutes ago, wally dugan said:

    it was  sent to the REME FORDING TRIALS UNIT  BASED AT FREMINGTON  also the second phase of stalwarts were given the numbers 33  56  63 66 AND so on without a prefix letter later ones numbers from  the SP series

    Thanks. Corrected that.
    Would love to see a registry of Chassis numbers against the allocated numbers and SP registrations. But guess that doesn't exist.

  11. 2 hours ago, wally dugan said:

    You may use the photographs of the saladin trials on the subject of  prototypes  of the  STALWART PV1 was given the number ALV 2  and returned to alvis on the 24/4/61 PV 2 was returned on the 8/10/62 this is 2720 RW PV3 on the  8/4/62 PV 9 had the number 504 FUW and was used for fording trials FREMINGTON NORTH DEVON    on  the 27/10/67

    Many thanks, @wally dugan
    Are you sure it's not Instow, where the Royal Marines have their vehicle testing location - where Camion was trialled? 

    PV-1-8.JPG.4b0cab766ccf45836a75207bbcbdbbdf.JPG

    PV-1-9.JPG.9ab50957822e5410f751bc214cc7316c.JPG


    And is the year of 27/10/67 correct for PV9, when so many Mk 2s had been built by then. Or, was there a different engine or something? PV3 is said to have been a diesel or RR multi-fuel engine and Alison automatic transmission.

    I'll take absolutely anything you have on the Saladin chassis development, PV1 and subsequent Stalwart developments. 

    Thanks

  12. 15 minutes ago, fv1609 said:

    A bridge that didn't carry vehicles would not be of great use to the Army. The system of bridge class & vehicle bridge class relationship must be compatible.

    Document_2022-09-09_143918.thumb.jpg.93ad16932fdcbe1b7c8ec8c413e13f57.jpg

     

    When is a bridge not a bridge ?


    312715676_MGBBridgetrain.jpg.ab0cb9a1aa1dd81b1b7c6b714b19f40c.jpg

    In order to classify a bridge, one has to measure the span and know it's material and strengths, and then decide the weights it can carry. A scaffold pole bridge wouldn't typically carry the same weights as a concrete and steel road bridge.
    Does the top classification in the picture below mean that it can carry five lorries at 9 tonne each with wheelbase of 13 feet, or just one lorry under 50 tonnes? 

    1445246957_Bridgeweights.thumb.jpg.ccc92e416e06567f205db775e883de2d.jpg

  13. On 6/1/2020 at 2:37 PM, fv1609 said:

    I seem to have used up my uploads for that post. Here is the next one, but there are loads more charts, illustrating that Bridge Class is a very complicated subject & is a lot more than just the weight of the vehicle basis.

    2132947703_Load6.thumb.jpg.539eb788af25e59c9b9fc37753603a44.jpg

     

    I think you might be confusing the classification given to a bridge, compared to vehicle bridge classification. 

  14. On 6/1/2020 at 9:06 AM, fv1609 said:

    Paragraph 2 is interesting. It might help dispel the belief that Bridge Classification is merely the weight of the vehicle & load.

    load.jpg.bac8dc30363e6290201c5284b9f2f6df.jpg

    Surely that's a matter of the tank weighing more at one end than the other, and whether the tractor or trailing axles are overloaded?

  15. On 3/26/2020 at 3:47 PM, wally dugan said:

    sdd2.thumb.jpg.f21d60bdcab8dacd7c39c94b4dfc62b9.jpgAs the title suggests my wife said it was time for me to sort out some of the boxes in the loft amongst the many files from FVRDE that l have collected here are just two the trails of the SALADIN MK2 as standard and a SALADIN MK2 fitted with differential lock it make interesting  reading the pictures need sorting 

    ...

    @wally dugan Can I use these Saracen images on my High Mobility Chassis web page please?

×
×
  • Create New...