Jump to content

Adrian Barrell

Members
  • Posts

    3,559
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Adrian Barrell

  1. Looks good. That's a 3.5 mile round trip including the run through the town. I suppose we might be able to run just north of the railway to avoid the road at other times?
  2. Here is a picture of them both, the Auster can just be seen in the top right of the picture.
  3. With mention of the Elvington Halifax, restored as Friday the 13th, the original was on display at the end of the War on the site of the John Lewis building in London. Unfortunately, at the end of the exhibition, it was scrapped! Also on display was an Auster IV, MT243, which I am now restoring back to flight!
  4. That's a good demonstration of why it didn't matter whether your Sherman was petrol or diesel.
  5. Drilling beans (insert other crop here)?
  6. So would that be the same weekend as Tankfest at Bovington?
  7. A9 was a cruiser but that was not fast, on road or off, so that argument does not hold water! The differences between the design brief and the finished article of most tanks are enough to make you wonder if they could be considered as the same vehicle. Centurion was considered a heavy cruiser at one point, probably because it was a direct development of the cruiser line, though equally different in many ways. It was not however intended as a traditional cruiser tank and indeed was not used as such.
  8. Centurion was, at one point of it's development known as a heavy cruiser but it stemmed from a 1943 requirement for a 'general service' tank. Even then it was realised that the cruiser/infantry idea was perhaps not the ideal.
  9. The first British built tank with a name as part of the official designation was Covenanter. It was a cruiser tank and it started the trend. Infantry tanks were named differently, Matilda and Valentine. Churchill was, presumably named after the man himself. The cruiser line ran, Covenanter, Crusader, Cavalier, Centaur, Cromwell, Challenger, Comet, Centurion, Chieftain and Challenger. They also mostly had alpha-numeric designations. Covenanter was A13 Mk111, Crusader A15 etc.
  10. I don't think there is any evidence to support this oft quoted rumour.
  11. Covenanter looked fantastic but had some 'interesting' design issues. It was not as bad as many accounts make out as most of its systems were used more or less succesfully in other vehicles. It did have a propensity to overheat however and as, at the time, armoured warfare was being conducted in the desert, it was deemed sensible to keep it for training in the UK.
  12. Anyone can view the posts but you have to be a Friend to post.
  13. Diamond T is the same. I think it's simply a result of the way the brakes work. You soon get used to it!
  14. I wouldn't worry about the thread, it will be a very good grade of steel. The tube nut that holds the clutch on is tightened to 650 ft pds and that looks like it would break at 50!
  15. I've never done one myself but you should tighten until the bolt has stretched .005" to .007". I expect this only applies to new bolts. Are you using a new bolt?
  16. Magneto points gap is 0.020" on both HRH and the HRUH.
  17. I have...... :cool2: Standby....
  18. All this techno babble....... Could be made up for all I know!
  19. Did anyone else read posts 4 and 5 and think 'what the hell are you on about?' :???
  20. Is he a driver of said deep wading vehicle?
  21. Either rescuing crew or more likely connecting a towing rope to recover the casualty?
  22. A failed deep wading, such as a drowned vehicle?
×
×
  • Create New...