-
Posts
3,469 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
40
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Events
Articles
Store
Downloads
Posts posted by Ron
-
-
-
-
Yes that is a G3L Lex. Do you know how the civy G3, WD G3, and G3L parts lists compare? Ron.
-
-
My local bearing company managed to find me a sealed bearing for the output end. These boxes use semi fluid grease, but I still found that it pumped out through the bearing. It was a few years ago now so I can't remember if they had to get the new bearing outer or inner ground to size? Maybe worth an enquiry with a bearing firm. (Darren Wrudd perhaps).
I wonder if the 1.5.48 is a rebuild date? Ron
-
No Gasket Pawel. They used "Shellac" in the old days. I use "Welseal" Ron
-
Seasons greetings Pawel and to all other forum members. Ron
-
-
-
I can clearly see that it's a post war civilian frame and engine. Has it got girder or tele forks? I think the REM prefix is from the later 40's. Ron
-
No it's just standard light springs. Ron
-
-
Stuart Bray has a couple, but I think are both 7/8". But some scrutiny might decide if you can machine out 1/16" to fit on G3 bars. The one I had off you Lex had been cut from it's handlebar clamp. Ron
-
-
Hi Terry. I don't know what the OREM is but the last military frame number in 1945 was 11129. They carried on into the 50's with the last of the WD models being civilianized, followed by purpose civilian models. I would hazard a guess at 1946. But the Royal Enfield Owners Club or VMCC should be able to date it accurately. Ron
-
Cutting in on Steve's thread and emphasizing my LOVE/HATE Matchless relationship. The clutch cable on my G3 had become pinched/damaged by the left side steering stop and my throttle cable was the type with an incorrect, in-line adjuster, so I've just replaced them both..........Not something I'd want to do on the roadside, even on a warm sunny day, let alone in the rain or dark!!!! Ron
-
I recently discovered that my 1940 Royal Enfield WD/C had been fitted with a later (WD/CO type) front frame section. Apparently these frames are quite weak and under the duress of heavy duty army work, it was quite common for them to break at the front down tube. So the heavier duty CO frame would often have been fitted.
I acquired a correct 1940 front frame from a fellow RE enthusiast, resprayed and fitted it. Fortunately it's just possible to swap the front frames without disturbing the engine/gearbox etc.
I've copied the markings from a series of army trials pictures. Ron
-
2
-
-
Good to see the photo record of your build Steve. Ron
-
That's sounds like a plan to me. Use all the best and original parts to build a factory spec 3SW. Then have freedom fun with the rest. Ron
-
Over the years I've acquired about 20 C spanners of various sizes from jumbles for just a few shillings each. Handy to have and I can usually find the right size for what I need. Ron
-
To my mind, the wheel bearing fitment and adjustment on these Matchless's is about as daft as you could think up🥴. Ron
-
It doesn't look too bad to me. I think I would leave it, maybe vapor/bead blast it? Ron
-
Triumph engine cases weren't painted to my knowledge? I hope not as I'll have 3 wrong Triumphs😕
I'll note that collar size from Brian. Ron
-
I think you're right Lex. I've had problems with the nozzles clogging up.
Nothing is like it used to be....Nitromores- -Humbrol enamels--Hammarite paint.....All bloody useless now. Ron
-
1
-
Flying flea info wanted
in Motorcycles
Posted · Edited by Ron
They look very nice in black and chrome! Ron