I didn't have much time to read thru the previous posts on this thread so fel free to kick my butt if I repeat anything said there.
I don't really think that the red cross is after us for using the red cross, but to defend the trademark they have to do something everyonce in a while. Just think if some foreign dictator in some far off nation just decided to paint all his vehicles with this logo to avoid being attacked. Off course the red cross couldn't accept that. But how can you explain that some are allowed to use the red cross (HMVs) and others (dictator) His vehicles might be as old as ours!! The red cross wouldn't get far in a court if they as a neutral organization treated HMVs and dictators differently. Then they would take side.
Ok, so this is a bit of a constructed example and I'm not sure it made any sense at all.
This part however should be understandable:
Perhaps if those of us that wants to have the red cross on the MVs could do a little work for the Red Cross organization!? And therefore be allowed to use the Red Cross. Collect money, show up at events and stand with the red cross people to give them attention.
Ok, I'm still pretty naive at the age of thirty-something!
Marty