Jump to content

Firefly Project


ajmac

Recommended Posts

Maurice

but what is meant by the last to be converted

Fair point,

 

ajmac

Mark Haywards book suggests that the first conversions were to M4A4 as they came over from the US, then M4 Hybrids as they were shipped then older M4s that were recalled in the US.

That depends on how you read it - it is too easy to regard the genealogy of the Firefly as a simple progression with MkVs converted first then Hybrids with a few Mk1 of welded fabrication at the end of production.

 

after your post last night I read through Mark Haywards book and I don't come to that conclusion, looking at text tables and photos (and other books) my conclusion is all types were represented at or around mid 1944 with MkVc being dominant.

 

As Maurice says there were Hybrids in ETO from mid June although at that stage the MkVc was the majority- this changed in mid to late 1944 when as the production of Fireflies increased the number of suitable MkVc diminished, the MkVs/M4A4 supplied through August to October 1944 were rebuilds of early M4A4s used to train US forces many were sub standard as they retained Westinghouse Electric traverse gear and were therefore unsuitable for conversion to Firefly. Hybrids although many by the same time were rebuilds had few compatibility problems - welded hull MK1s would have been a mixed bag however -any Mk1 remanufactured which retained either the Westinghouse traverse or the Pressed Steel Car Co. transmission-dynamo layout would be ruled out (if I remember correctly Adrian Barrell mentioned this on another thread).

 

Other tanks supplied in the second half of 1944 were otherwise incompatable such as M4 105s and M4A1 75s which had the PSCC layout (rather than the curved hull restricting stowage) and of course various M4A1 and M4A2 76 and other samples such as T270129 -which as an M4 might have been compatable had it not been fitted with spaced out suspension.

 

The final transfers of M4s (it doesn't say whether they are M4 or Hybrids) to Britain were 90 swapped for M4A1 76 to US forces in theatre in January 1945, but perhaps up to 80 others were transfered from US 12th Army Group for conversion to Firefly were additional to this transfer. There is a noted photo of US marked Fireflies both standard M4c and M4c hybrid (both remanufacted) at a delivery centre with some M22 light tanks which were probably some of the 40 or so those delivered to 9th Army part of Gen. Bradley 12th Army Group in March 1945, these were probably amongst the last Firefly built.

 

Maurice, I would be intersted to know the number of the tank you mention as being back loaded for conversion as I wasn't aware of any vehicles being withdrawn from service. I also note that the number of your tank is a fairly early number for a remanufacture tank -perhaps a vehicle retained for trials being converted.

 

Steve

Edited by steveo578
bad grammar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 162
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Adrian Barrell

You can almost imagine units offering 75mm tanks up in an effort to get more 17 pdr!

 

I can imagine some wit putting in an extensive spares lists -starting

 

complete 17pdr gun, mount shield -

 

if you can't get a complete one build it yourself:laugh:

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi Alastair

 

Yes it's a good book -a good opportunity to read it again even at midnight, lots of interesting research especially on the service side -there's still lots to work out about Fireflies for example how and where they were reconstructed - even today possible new stuff came up with Maurice's disclosure of a hybrid being backloaded for rebuild -I was under the impression that only un-issued Shermans were rebuilt due to the need to get value for money for extensve amount of work involved, seems I live and learn.:)

 

Hope your loyds going well?

 

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maurice asked me to post these picture of his progress as he cannot seem to attach them to him posts.

 

No doubt he will be along to explain them. I can say that it looks fantastic!

 

 

In French "trop mortel ! " :wow:

What is your drug Maurice ? do you have a little for me ?

Fantastic job :saluting:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to check that number up on that firefly , got it written down somewere.

Yes it is a new turret ring , the other was missing . Actually I started with an empty Hull , everything was taken out to remove the differential carrier through the Hull instead of taking the final drive housing of

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right.... I remember when Budge was selling take outs for £250 and new ones in boxes for £2500.

 

And were we were last Sunday , that is the place these radials came from , and were then sold on to Budge for 500,- € new in the box.

rubber tracks were 1200,-€ in those days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you don't get closer than that!

I found that the cast iron really took a pounding on the Loyds when they were targeted, I don't mean the obvious damage, but hairline cracks all over the block. It looked ok, even up close, but tap with a rubber mallet and oops, the bell housing fell off! Something to watchout for when re-using cast Iron engine parts that have spent time on a target range.... Not aimed at you Adrian, you've done it all before, but others may not.

Edited by ajmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found that the cast iron really took a pounding on the Loyds when they were targeted, I don't mean the obvious damage, but hairline cracks all over the block. It looked ok, even up close, but tap with a rubber mallet and oops, the bell housing fell off! Something to watchout for when re-using cast Iron engine parts that have spent time on a target range.... Not aimed at you Adrian, you've done it all before, but others may not.

 

Good point Alastair. I suppose Loyds , having little in the way of protection for the internals suffered more than most. My front engine gear casing had the rh mounting knocked off by a large shell hitting the lower side but this did not damage anything else in the engine. 1 1/2" of armour plate protected it from all but direct hits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...