Jump to content
scruffyHerrbert

Ammunition: can anyone identify the era of these rifle cartridges?

Recommended Posts

Curious to know roughly how old these might be - found whilst sorting through old junk dating back 100+ years at my new place a year or so ago - rediscovered them a couple of weeks ago and wondered if it's possible to identify them from profile/size/markings?

 

The bases (with a diameter of 11.88mm) are divided into 4 segments, with one of the four on each being stamped "S E"

2 cartridges carry a ".D." in one segment, whilst the other two are stamped "..D.."

Pairs of numbers appear in the remaining 2 segments on each cartridge (1, 18) (1, 18) (11, 17) (12, 17)

 

2015-07-05 14.04.25.jpg

2015-07-05 14.01.09.jpg

2015-07-05 14.01.39.jpg

2015-07-05 14.02.10.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A clear picture or list of the headstamp would help. Though this seems to be the best match at the moment. .425Westely Richards Magnum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently the round was developed to be fired through a modified Mauser 98. Having hunted through dimensions its the only one I can find close. The use of a stripper with the round is also specifically mentioned. It was designed as a big game round . Next to have a look through headstamps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like WW1 German 7.92mm Mauser to me, copper washed cases, and by the looks of it live rounds as well that will either need an FAC to hold, or be rendered inert.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've found three places that use D on the headstamp around the turn of the 20th Century. Dumdum Arseanl in India 1895 till about 1913. Thne two German marks Gustav Genschon at Durlach and Koniglicue Munitions Fabrick at Dresden.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree, 7.92x57 Mauser. The numbers, IIRC, were the month and year of manufacture

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did subsequently wonder if the numbers might represent month & year of manufacture - good to get some corroboration on that thought.

 

Thanks all, for the interesting info/feedback.

 

Apologies for the poor focus on the headstamp image - best I can do at present, having got dust in lense of camera last year (and not been in a position to replace it).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...