Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

That Jeep went for £9,000.00 , plus 12% commission.  The other jeep,which was a Ford. I bid up too £10,500.00 not quite making the reserve .  I did the deal for £12.000.00 including commission ... 

Posted
On 14/04/2018 at 7:29 PM, Jessie The Jeep said:

The first looked to have a non-wartime transmission and other non-original features which is probably why the price is lower than expected.

Yes quite a few non original features .......

 

IMG_5474.JPG

IMG_5481.JPG

IMG_5482.JPG

Posted

Lot 1925 I just dont get this one at all. 

it states it has a dating letter from the MVT stating its a "45" really ????? did the verification officer have their eyes closed during the inspection.

Posted
On 18/04/2018 at 7:02 PM, gas 44 said:

Lot 1925 I just dont get this one at all. 

it states it has a dating letter from the MVT stating its a "45" really ????? did the verification officer have their eyes closed during the inspection.

The Photos don't do it any justice  , it was far worse in the flesh ....🙈

 

Posted

Its not the condition , people do all  sorts of things to their vehicles, and have every right to do so.

But there is no way the MVT should have dated that as a "45" the glearing thing is wrong engine, trannie pedals,, need I go on. if it I had made that purchase I would asking some very uncomforable questions.......like did the inspector have a whit stick.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...