gritineye Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 I found this article very interesting, even though the formulas mostly went over my head, I now have some idea of the engineering problems involved in producing such an engine....enjoy. http://www.rrec.org.uk/Cars/Rolls-Royce_Motor_Car_Engines/History_of_a_Dimension.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubberduck Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 Nice find. Definitely need a good cup of tea and a slice of cake to help it go down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grasshopper Posted July 17, 2015 Share Posted July 17, 2015 Thanks for posting Bernard, an interesting read. It's easy to forget all the toil and failures that go into into things like developing engines; all we (the user) see is the end product of it all, which in most cases just keeps going. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andym Posted July 18, 2015 Share Posted July 18, 2015 This bit is particularly interesting: "The reliability at this final power was always being improved because of the military parallel development, mostly on the straight eight engine which had also been bored out to 3.750 inches. This engine was known as the B81 and one particular requirement was a continuous run at maximum power of 168 hours. No stop of any kind could be tolerated in spite of fuel containing 3.6 cc lead per gallon. Brightray exhaust valves and inserted exhaust valve seats were required in addition to considerable development of the pistons before a week's continuous running could be achieved. On lead-free fuel the same combination of pieces would run for 700 hours, this, regrettably, being only of academic interest." Andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gritineye Posted July 18, 2015 Author Share Posted July 18, 2015 This bit must have had RR engineers weeping into their tea cups, it must have cost them a fortune chasing an engine fault that didn't exist, human error, human incompetence, or spiteful sabotage? Until every improvement was included success was not achieved and only later was it discovered that at Aachen a restriction in the test bed coolant system had halved the flow and that the engine thermostat had been removed, thereby throwing to the winds a valuable 5 lb/in2 pressure with its higher boiling point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.