yorkie56 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Does anyone know where I can obtain a copy of 26/Regulations/3341. Equipment Regulations. Pamphlet No.8. Nomenclature & Coding of 'A', 'B', 'C' & 'D' Vehicles, 1964. Many Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fv1609 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 (edited) Usually you will find them buried in a lace-together binder that is an evolution of Regulations of the Equipment of the Army 1948 WO Code No.1782. These binders can host up to 16 separate pamphlets. Many of these had a major revision in 1955 when the title changed to Equipment Regulations & some replacement pamphlets were introduced. I have four of these binders but all contain different pamphlets from different times & with different degrees of amendments. Pamphlet No.8 that you are after was originally WO Code No. 11537 but in 1964 became Army Code No.14249. Although I have that, the contents were totalled changed in 1968 & then again in 1969 & designated Army Code No.60293. So I doubt that you will find a true 1964 edition because all of it was amended. I think the reason for this massive amendment was that in 1967 Asset Code structure changed to 4+4 digits from 6+2+3 digits. Although there had been an earlier change in 1955 from 4+2+3 digits to 6+2+3 It's a very useful reference source & far too much to copy. But were there any particular pages you were after that I could scan? So in summary I have the 1955 edition & the 1964 edition although the whole content of that was changed in 1968 & 1969 Edited February 19, 2014 by fv1609 Clarification of Asset Codes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yorkie56 Posted February 19, 2014 Author Share Posted February 19, 2014 Many thanks for your reply, but it looks a bit of a minefield, so I think I will leave it at that. Once again many thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fv1609 Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 Many thanks for your reply, but it looks a bit of a minefield, so I think I will leave it at that. Once again many thanks. It is indeed! I've just realised I hadn't clarified the position with Asset Codes changing twice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lauren Child Posted February 19, 2014 Share Posted February 19, 2014 It is indeed! I've just realised I hadn't clarified the position with Asset Codes changing twice. The wonderful thing about standards is that there's so many to choose from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.