I've been keeping my nose out of this particular thread, because I know that I'll find it difficult to keep my latin temperament at bay, but here goes...
The problem with CMV is quite simple, and it's basically due to what's best termed as the "good enough" sindrome. I'm a subscriber to CMV and have been disappointed in the quality of their articles from the word go. Obviously, being a refugee from Wheels and Tracks means that one's expectations are inevitably pretty high, and given that the pressure and time constraints on having to provide a monthly issue must be enormous, I still feel that there is very little excuse in producing articles with absolutely no depth on such a regular basis. I mean, honestly, it's not as though there's not enough scope, is there? I remember that a couple of years ago they did an "in depth" (ha!) overview of military Morris Commercials - it lasted two (or was it three?) issues, and was laughable, nothing more than a collection of photos (very) loosely strung together with some inane text. I know that this sounds harsh, but seeing as I write articles for Italian classic motorcycle magazines on a pretty regular basis, I feel that I can permit myself the luxury of judging others efforts. Perhaps their contributor base isn't wide enough to allow for the sort of work that the late, great Bart Vanderveen used to regale us with, but the fact is that a well researched and well written article on just about anything is guaranteed to be absolutely riveting (does anybody remember the article on Le Tournaux graders in W&T? - brilliant stuff - and of absolutely no immediate interest to yours truly).
Rant over, I'll go to bed now