11th Armoured

Great stuff! 👍

If the new museum has any space constraints, then it would probably also be more flexible as an exhibit if it was made of wood or similar - if it was a policy to periodically change the items on display, then moving a range wreck, a static, cosmetically-restored 'original' or even an unpowered new-build replica in mild steel or whatever isn't necessarily going to be a simple matter. If you're also going to display railway rolling stock, then this may be something you've already taken into account, but worth bearing in mind. Kevin

Yes Paul, and the operative word in what I wrote was "If", so thank you for clarifying matters, but no "pessimistic view of the StuG and its owner" was made nor implied, I trust you'll concede. As an onlooker to yet another apparent TM bashing thread (StuGs & their maltreatment seems to be the soup du jour at present, it appears), I was simply stating a possible reason (in my own admitted ill-informed opinion) for the reported reluctance of the TM to continue with hosting an externally owned vehicle. It appears I was wrong, which is absolutely fine by me - it's a poor day that goes by w

I don't know any of the details here (& I suspect I'm not alone in this...), but playing 'devil's advocate' for a second, might I point out that the entire museums sector has taken a MASSIVE hit as a result of coronavirus & the resulting enforced closures, which has meant that for most of them their non-grant income has been reduced to zero or close to. If the privately-owned StuG came with any ongoing financial implications for the museum, either in rental charges, maintenance commitments or basic running/wear & tear costs, then I can see why management may have had to make unp

I've always liked the look of the Humber Scout Car & they're a fairly uncommon sight in my experience, so it's good to hear that a couple more may soon see the light of day 👍

Seconded!

I'm sure an owner will come along shortly with the definitive answer regarding turret rotation, although a fixed turret sounds just a bit inflexible, to be honest. This photo's not the clearest, but it's the best I've found thus far - going by what seems to be the MG slot and the position of the smoke mortar & bracket, I'd say this shows the turret rotated rearwards:

Some of the photos on here show the turret rotated (albeit slightly): https://www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.asp?armor_id=1176 Also, the first photo on here shows a chap in typical 'tank commander' pose with his upper body & arms out of the turret hatch: https://tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/gb/Morris_Light_Reconnaissance_Car.php Not sure if the hatch is standard or modified though. HTH, Kevin

Perhaps unsurprisingly, given the standard you've achieved so far, that looks like a cracking result 👍

I'm astounded by the condition of some of the c. 100-year-old parts you have - bolt threads, nuts and even what seem to be relatively thin sheet metal sections still perfectly usable after all this time. Meanwhile, I have cars & vans that are only a tenth of that age with parts & fixings utterly disintegrated & fit only for scrap. 'Things ain't what they used to', certainly springs to mind!

Or could it even be a bit of macabre humour - 'bullseye' & all that?

It's on Facebook - a page called 'Colourised - PIECE of JAKE'. The caption for this one is: "An RAF sergeant shares an alfresco lunch with two Dutch women in traditional costumes at Nieuw- and St. Joosland, near Middelburg, soon after the town had been liberated by Allied forces, November 1944". HTH

So now you've been warned off by a 'higher-up' who doesn't want the truth revealing that the government dumped a load of surplus military equipment after the war? Probably best if you let the matter lie, then...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enfield_No._2

That's just to slow it down when descending a hill... 😉