-
Posts
226 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Events
Articles
Store
Downloads
Posts posted by ltwtbarmy
-
-
-
Once again, thanks! Will let him know, and then he can decide what to do with them. I have a feeling he’ll just hang them up on his garage wall as a display, but at least we’ll know what they came off.
-
Thanks Ron, thought you’d identify them. Muchly appreciated as always! Is the Westwood cap military or a civilian modification?
-
Hi all. This afternoon I went to help a friend of mine clear out a garage, and amongst all the Jaguar parts he stockpiled over the last 40 years, we also found a motorcycle petrol tank and fork, which he’d completely forgotten he ever had, and subsequently, has no idea what they’re off.
Would appreciate the collective wisdom on this forum to help identifying them. Just to confuse matters, the parts might not even be off the same motorcycle!
Thanks in advance all.
-
9 hours ago, XS650 said:
No but it adds to the risks.
Perhaps my original statement was a little blunt but I was genuinely shocked when I saw the photographs.
I worked in the construction industry for many years and if a HSE Inspector saw an unsupported excavation like that he would issue a Prohibition Notice.
The man in the picture above holding the ranging rod in photo above is in real danger if the ground next to him collapsed.
By all means excavate the AFV's but a lot more attention should be given to shoring.
Thank you.
-
2 hours ago, Chris Hall said:
I think there were 30, 2 washed out to sea, 2 washed into the fish pits (whatever they are), 16 or so ended up in the flood defences and left and the rest I guess, went back to store.
They weren’t just used as a lump to fill the gap, they were used to ferry people, tools, Earth, stone etc. around the floods and transport to the breach.
In fact, having access to facebook, the crowland lvt group have a copy of an old newspaper article up, which says that nearly 30 Buffalos were used. 16 were used on the first try, and after 3 were washed away, more were brought in to shore up the gap.
Something which occurred to me, but were all the 30 or so used Buffalos? Could it be that 16 Buffalos were used first and then another amphibious type used, possibly “Neptunes” (see shortcut below) bringing the said total to 30 or thereabouts? The picture in the shortcut below seems to point to other types used, apart from Buffalos.
https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/history/fight-survival-year-great-flood-12720587I just went into eddy8men’s thread on the subjeft, and yes, Neptunes were also used. So, it could be that 16 Buffalo type were used, and then augmented with Neptune LVTs.
- 1
-
On 5/1/2021 at 8:13 AM, XS650 said:
That excavation is a death trap.
Care to qualify that statement?
-
16 “or so” makes more sense. It’s just that all reports seem to be taking the figure of 16 as the gospel truth. Sorry, the pedant in me is taking over again!
-
On 4/30/2021 at 9:57 PM, Chris Hall said:
Is that the same place? Because it seems the quoted number of 16 is a little off. I count 24 that I can see!
-
Morning! Re the picture in your initial post, it is indeed a follow me vehicle, as the original photo caption states. I have also posted that picture in the other thread you had started, asking about RAF Follow Me vehicles in WW2!
-
2 years since the last contribution to this thread however thought this might be relevant, in that at least, towards the end of the war, on at least one fighter command airfield (from the original caption of the possibly posed photograph), which british and american bomber pilots used in emergencies, Follow Me vehicles were used.https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205454241
From the original wartime caption- Leading Aircraftwoman Day is one of several W.A.A.F. drivers at a Fighter Command airfield on the South Coast, who with jeeps, guide aircraft to a parking place. Picture (issued 1945) shows - Leading Aircraftwoman Phyllis Day driving a jeep to guide a bomber which had made an emergency landing on a Fighter Command airfield. SEE A.M.BULLETIN NO.18356 : 15th April 1945.
- 6
-
Closest to Bedford armour (just the riot shields) I got on the merlin archive. Data is for 66KD06, but the pic shows MJ 98KB60, which is shown as having been in NI on the record.
https://merlinarchive.uk/vehicle/66KD06
https://merlinarchive.uk/vehicle/98KB60There was a thread on arrse which I can’t find at the mo, but it featured a lot of rare pics. Clive Elliott might help because if I remember well, he had found the thread.
-
The uk defence journal mentions Boxer and Ajax.
Also - https://www.army-technology.com/news/the-british-army-could-have-an-ajax-squadron-this-summer/
-
-
Would any of the following work, in conjunction with cloth covered insulating tape? I’ve had a look at xmod and they seem to be out of stock of the correct conduit.
https://www.autosparks.co.uk/electrical-components/conduit
I know that there is some insulating tape which closely matches the appearance of the original covering, being matt in appearance and can be used to disguise.
Also found this - https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Cable-Flexible-Conduit-Sleeving-Split-Unsplit-Loom-Harness-Various-Sizes-/263163209329
or this - https://www.vintagecarparts.co.uk/parts_index/conduit
-
11 hours ago, Chris Hall said:
Great photo, can you make out the number on the original?
USA 4061613.
-
Wow, lovely vehicles. Seems that both are ex british military. The second one (949BVO) was first registered in 1959 and last on the road in 1984 according to the dvla. https://vehicleenquiry.service.gov.uk/VehicleFound?locale=en
As a side note, i hope they take the spare wheel out of the first one and stick it back in the second! -
9 hours ago, Willy Landin said:
Thanks ltwtbarmy for your answer! Do you know how can I contact them?
Try contacting the user RAFMT who is on the thread I showed you and can probably assist you with the RAF museum. Good luck!
- 1
-
The RAF museum might be able to help. This thread here has a list of publications which they have.
- 1
-
I love the “artillAry” on the military data plate. Wonder what happened there.
-
Ok, that seems to have clarified that I guess. So it was actually an FH70 limber or tractor. Thanks Richard! In fact, just had another look, and the full title is “Tractor-Limber, Wheeled, GS,FH70, 10 tonne, 6x6, with crane, Foden”. Quite a mouthful!
-
Regarding Warner plugs and sockets, I suggest trawling for either Bofors L/70 equipment spares because they had them as well. We always had the cables in the CES tool and spares boxes that came with each gun. Also, I remember that the italians used to have these sockets on their vehicles as well, at least up to the early 80s, so that might be another source.
-
Just some info I found on the Commercial Motor archive - http://archive.commercialmotor.com/article/1st-november-1974/40/fodens-at-the-front-by-gordon-murra
Note that as far as I know, this vehicle was never designated as an FH70. The FH70 was the actual gun it was designed to tow and service. I have had more luck on the internet looking for Foden 6x6 gun limber or gun tractor.
-
Interesting Matchless G3L Drivers Handbook
in Motorcycles
Posted
BAOR 23 location- https://www.baor-locations.org/BFPO.aspx.html