Jump to content

mcspool

Members
  • Posts

    1,540
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mcspool

  1. There was a later sand mw in overloon, behind the glass, not in the main hall. I worked near there in 2000 and it was there then. i remembered the early side panels on it, so its probably the same one. I do have some pictures somewhere i'll see if i can find them!!

     

    generaaltje2160.jpg

    This MW was offered for sale in 2004: http://www.mapleleafup.org/forums/showthread.php?t=3032

     

    It was privately owned before then, but maybe the owner used to store it at the Overloon museum?

     

    Hanno

  2. I've not heard of one in france so thats a new one, the pictures would be intresting.
    Here's the only picture I took. The Bedford MW resides under some trees in the owner's yard, together with a Chevrolet CMP C15 4x2 15-cwt. If I recall correctly, this Bedford was restored from bits and pieces found in France.

     

    Hope this helps,

    Hanno

    Spoelstra - Normandy 2004 - Bedford MW.jpg

  3. cilbedfordmw.jpg

     

    This is the one from lover! Saw this one earlier this year and met the owner. Ron is a gentleman indeed and was good enough to help me with some early parts for mine. This ones chassis number is 500 after mine.

     

    Looks like it´s the same as this one:

    Hants_Pageant_07_083.jpg

  4. This ones from holland, i've not, as yet seen another one as early as this. The gentleman that owns it has spent 20 years restoring it to factory condition and it is immaculate. his knowledge of the early production is amazing he put me right on so many things!!
    That gentleman is a friend of mine. The Bedford was the first of many more HMV´s he has restored over the past 25 years. Would you believe this MW was restored more than 20 years ago? Well, it was!

     

    As far as I know, this is the only aero screen MW in Holland.

     

    Here´s a sample of the later ones:

    IMG_0616_resized.jpg

     

    Hanno

  5. I think the square shoulder tyres were known as ND and the later rounded ones as NDCC.
    That's correct, NDT = Non-Directional Tread, a.k.a. NDMS, Non-Directional Mud and Snow. NDCC stands for Non-Directional Cross Country tread, a post-war pattern.

     

    British wartime tyres came in the following types (source: Data Book of Wheeled Vehicles / Army Transport 1939-1945, edited by David Fletcher):

    - Cross Country: heavily built tyres with bold, broad and deep treads.

    - General Purpose: tyres of lighter construction than Cross Country, with narrower, shallower treads and more rounded shoulders.

    - Sand: tread often similar to the normal commercial design, but it is broader and carcass is of special light constuction.

    The best known British pattern is Dunlop's Trak Grip. As I understand it, this tread was moulded both on Cross Country and General Purpose tyres. The latter is shown in the pic below.

     

    Hope this helps,

    Hanno

    dunlop_trakgrip_6ply_1.jpg

  6. Hi Mark, although I'm not Joris or Enigma, I'm Dutch too. Basically, Holland moved on after WW2. Yes, the war had a huge impact, but also many people led their lives as they were used to. The Dutch are renowed for making the most of a situation. After the war there was a huge amount of work to be done, rebuilding the country and economy (just like in the UK and many other countries). Most of the battle rubbish and scars were removed, it's a small country you know and we use every single square inch of it.

     

    There was a time our hobby was frowned upon, but the past decades show time are changing, maybe because the generation who lived through the war as children are now retiring and reflecting on their lives and becoming more mellow?

     

    Although I was born in the 60s and have an open mind towards Germany's role during WW2, I was speechless when I first (some 10? years ago) turned into the entrance at the War & Peace show only to find the traffic being controlled by guys dressed up as WW2 German soldiers!!! Apparently the fact that the Germans were "bad" was somewhere stuck in my mind. A recent poll showed only the youngest generation has no hard feelings towards the Germans. So, apparently, those feelings can be handed down a couple of generations (who did not have to live through it) before it wears off.

     

    Hope this helps,

    Hanno

  7. Broadly speaking, apart from some minor modifications as pointed out by Ben and others, US-manufactured vehicles were pretty much used as they left the factory, including the Olive Drab paint.

     

    Before the US was engaged in WW2, the British and other Allies has more room to specify their modifications. The M3 Grant tank, for example, had a completely different turret fitted to the hull of the M3 Medium Tank as the US Army specified it. When the USA was fully engaged in the war themselves, it was basically take it as is or leave it.

     

    Regarding unit markings, Commonwealth unit markings differed vastly from US ones.

     

    On the subject of recognition markings (roundels and stars), I quote Don Dingwall's CANADIAN ARMOUR IN THE ITALIAN CAMPAIGN ITALY 1943-1945, Canadian Vehicle Markings, Order of Battle and War Establishments for 1st Canadian Corps and 1st Canadian Armoured Brigade:

    "By the spring of 1944, the U.S. star was adopted as the standard AFV recognition marking. Prior to this, the combination of the red/white/red AFV flash and a roundel of red, white and blue, similar to early war RAF roundels, was used. The roundel was applied to the tops of turrets or engine decks on Shermans and other vehicles where space allowed, and on the engine hoods of Otters and other wheeled AFVs, and on the cab roofs of many softskins. This was officially discontinued on April 11, 1944, but roundels were still seen for some time afterwards."

     

    See "Crooked White Star" on the MLU Forum (http://www.mapleleafup.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=4760) for the official Canadian instructions to mark vehicles with "White stars five pointed". There is no mention between stars in broken or full circles – this was the difference between stencilling and painting by hand! It does give an explanation for the “crooked star”: the instructions included a drawing of the star standing on one end!

     

    Hope this helps,

    Hanno

  8. This CMP Ford F15A has had its original bridge classification plate refitted when being restored. It is flat and has the size of a CMP headlight aperture. It has four holes along the edge, plus two more towards the centre to attach it to the truck, either in place of the headlight, or another place in case two headlights are fitted.

     

    imm035_36.jpg

     

    Hope this helps,

    Hanno

  9. I agree Neil it should stay exactly where it is,too many of these relics get hauled off "for preservation"
    Can´t agree more, but that is exactly why an effort should be made to find out its history. There are too many relics about with false histories based on hearsay.

     

    So, is this turret sitting in an area which used to be the training ground near an army camp? If so, which units were stationed in such a camp, and when?

     

    Mind you, while the army used outdated tanks during WW2 for target practice, the Sherman was in use until well after WW2. Personally I think it is unlikely a Sherman (turret) was used for target practice during WW2. As I said, research has to be done to find out what it is exactly. Otherwise it could equally well serve out its days in someone´s garden as a flower pot!

     

    My 2 Euro cents worth,

    Hanno

  10. How far is it from Eindhoven to Overloon?
    80 km, less than an hour´s drive.

     

    Other option is the international Amsterdam airport (Schiphol), which is 160 km or close to two hour's drive.

     

    If you make it over here, let me know and I'll try to join you lot.

     

    He're some pics of what's there to see:

    http://www.surfacezero.com/g503/showgallery.php?cat=916&ppuser=24

     

     

    imm001_2.jpg

  11. This little piece of scrap metal sits in a wood near Newbury and has done so since WW2 when it was allegedly used for the practice placement of demolition charges by US paratroopers form the 101st - the damage up top would suggest this is probably correct?

    Interesting find. This Sherman turret has indeed had its roof blown in; the right hand side was cut away with a torch.

     

    What proof is there this was a 101AB training aid?

     

    Regards,

    Hanno

×
×
  • Create New...