Jump to content

honeileen

Members
  • Posts

    282
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by honeileen

  1. I agree with you Mike, Spits and bits are smaller and easier to maintain/rebuild than the bigger birds. The Lanc has a good few hours to go since its last major a couple of years back.

    But like everything the RAF at the time had tools and facilities to keep the Vulcan flying BUT AT A COST! they chose to pull out of flying it because of this cost of maintaining it. I myself have pumped thousands of gallons of fuel into 558 and 426 when they were still in RAF service in the 80,s. I take my hat off to the guys that restored XH558 but it is an impossible dream for a civvy outfit to keep it going. Im just saying what shame the RAF could not afford to keep her.

     

    Christian

  2. There is a big difference in price in keeping an MV on the road or static compared keeping a Vulcan or any other airplane static or flying. Shame the RAF didnt take the project on for the historic flight, but i guess with cutbacks on defence spending and some common sense by a civil servants for once they saw the light!!

     

    I will go and put my flack jacket on now:-D

     

    Christian

  3. Thats excellent!! and its the sort of stuff i collect, ive got lots of old papers and letters from the early 1900,s i need to sit down translate and scan one day.

    All found in old houses bought and sold around here.

     

    Christian

  4. I can remember at RAF Lyneham in the 80,s we had 1 4tonner that was a pile of s""t, the runt of the litter. had the same problems on hills and on the flat would not do more than 45. MTSS gave up on looking for the problem and if you were a bad boy you got that truck for the week delivering around southern England.

     

    Christian

×
×
  • Create New...