Jump to content

REME 245

Members
  • Posts

    1,003
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by REME 245

  1. The Police would say that only specifically trained officers are qualified to examine a weapon and decide if it is legally deactivated.

     

    Hence without a certificate they are in their rights to seize a weapon until such time as it can be expertly examined.

     

    Having done this provided no one has interfeared with the deact spec i.e. making the barrel come off a post 94 Bren Gun, they have to hand it back.

  2. The great majority of Canadian manufactured vehicles would have been disposed of fairly rapidly at the end of the war so the chances of this one surviving in military service until the 1950's to receive this body is remote.

     

    The Maple Leaf Up Forum is the principal source for Canadian manufactured vehicles.

  3. The principal difference between old and new spec brens is that you cannot remove the barrels on new spec.

     

    Some people interfere with the weld on later ones to achieve this but avoid this has any changes to the deac spec will result in the weapon referting to its original sectoon 5 clasification.

     

    As other have said, it depends on what period you are trying to portray and then try to aquire a Bren with all the parts appropriate to that mark and not a mix and match.

  4. I have just purchased a second one of these Generators which has a different arrangement of terminals.

     

    It has separate terminals marked high and low power or similar presumably allowing charging at different rates.

     

    The manufacturer is also listed as EP Company. Any suggestions on manufactuer or why this different pattern.

     

    I am also looking for a work shop manual rather than the hand book which comes in the spare parts tin. Any source for spares would also be useful.

     

    The sets were also originally associated with the 22 Set rather than the later 62 which must have seen very limited war-time service.

  5. They are certainly not Light weight trousers and almost look jungle issue.

     

    If you have got your terminology correct Light Weight Trousers are still in use by certain units and Cadet Forces so souring a pair even new should not be a problem.

  6. Mark,

     

    OEP220 was just a military designation, (Oil. Extreme Pressure), it equates to 80w/90 gear oil or EP90 / Hypoid 90. The wishbones hold a reserve of oil that lubricates the suspension pins, that is why you will always have drips in this area.

     

    Having said this one one occasion being ex-REME I tried to inject oil into the suspention links of an A Squadron Royal Yeomanary Fox I found it full of grease and it took a lot of pumping to displace this with oil.

     

    The next day there was a puddle of oil under each wheel station so I did'nt bother again.

    Knowing crews I would immagine most of the squadrons vehicles were so greased.

     

    The other favourite one was gease in the steering boxes of MJ's as they have what crews assume ro be grease.

  7. About ten years ago the Russian Defence Disposal Organisation announced they were about to start selling large quantities of war-time vehicles and guns on to the market.

     

    This never happened and it seems unlikely that they still retain large stocks of war-time AFV's in storage but they obviously still have some.

     

    The Gaz Jeeps looked a bit strange to me. Possibly made up bodies on modern chassis.

     

    War-time AFV's were still held in war reserve stocks into the 1980's and hence survive in quantities, but the Gaz jeeps would have been disposed of many years ago.

×
×
  • Create New...