Jump to content

79x100

Members
  • Posts

    1,024
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by 79x100

  1. Is it the case that an overseas authority, not finding an original chassis number has applied a 17-digit VIN number which is still  on the chassis ? If so, it should be quite possible to register in the UK on that basis but I believe that the original number should be cancelled by over-stamping....If you wish it to be registered using the factory number then that ought to be possible but it's going to require the services of an authorised club with a clued-up and motivated Dating Officer...Not all of them are.  It's quite common to find vehicles registered on casting numbers and that sort of thing and with perseverance, this can usually be sorted out.

  2. The contract number stamped below 'C/S14219' was an RAF contract for 2826 machines with the number range 17001 - 19826 and delivered during 1943.

    A lot of WD/COs had been passed to the Home Office by 1945, for instance for use by the Fires Services and it seems that a number went to Central / Eastern Europe with UNRRA aid missions.

    • Like 1
  3. 2 hours ago, Ron said:

    I'm not up on post war vehicles and I thought it was an Army unit? Even so, when I zoom in on that picture, the writing on the tax disc looks like it might just be a makers label like Raydiot or Stadium for instance.

    Someone above has quoted Defence of the realm with no other information?  Ron

     

    Ron

    Ron, I'm pretty sure that's a 'Desmo' backing disc in the holder.

    Pre- and Early-war Triumphs, as was shown on this forum, were supplied with holders already fitted, and containing a Triumph advert, presumably for showroom display.

     

     

     

    Desmo.jpg

    Triumph Disc.jpg

    • Like 2
  4. The WD/C saw limited service with the BEF in 1940 and several hundred may have been left in France.  A handful of survivors are known. They mainly saw service on the U.K. Home Front, as in fact did the WD/CO,  many of which had been transferred to the Home Office by 1944. There is actually no evidence that any of the four-stroke Enfields were officially on the establishment of any of the British-supplied army units in NW Europe...so any parts in The Netherlands will have arrived there later.

    The scene is very international though and the Dutch have been plundering UK jumbles for years !😁

  5. That's a nice Norton Doherty twistgrip on there, Steve. Presumably pre-war civvy as it's 7/8"...The colour underneath looks more like Olive Drab a than KG3...Could it have been a WD restoration taken back to black again at a time when WD bikes weren't fetching ? 1970s wiring colours by the look of it.

     

  6. They gave about ten years to register vehicles based on the old log books with no additional checks and finally had to give up as it was obvious the number plate dealers were buying up lost books with 'nice' numbers. It was widely published in the motorcycle press at the time that the system was coming to an end and documentation would be required...The Lovejoys of the old vehicle trade were more than capable of faking an old painted number plate and bolting it to a rusty wreck.

    As an enthusiast for old vehicles and historical records in general, I find it a tragedy that the LVLO records were destroyed....but they were, so unless you can find the log book, there is no way that you can hope to reclaim it now. We're forty years on from when it was last possible and the situation has only become more difficult with each policy change.

    There is nothing to stop you displaying off-road with your old plates, if you want to...and within about ten years that's likely to be all that is permitted with any of our infernal combustion engines...

  7. 24 minutes ago, AmphibAndy said:

    Reading this again, you mention microfiche copies of registrations.    Do you know for sure that local councils provided copies to DVLA?   It always seem utterly bonkers that DVLA should have taken over the registration of vehicles from local councils and told them to destroy the records.  They are still refusing to reallocate the correct and original number to my bike even though its plain for all that it was correctly painted on the bike when we bought it in 1974.    My father mislaid the log book and I promised him before he passed away that I would continue to pursue DVLA for this number.   No doubt they want to sell it in one of their auctions at some future date.   If there are microfiche maybe there is hope.  This is the bike with the original number when I started to restore it in 2015

    DSC07078.jpg

    Andy, there will only have been a record created (and microfilmed at Swansea) for vehicles which were 'active' after computerisation began. In some cases, this will have involved the keeper forwarding the old brown log book and they should have microfilmed it before destruction...However, if you know that the old brown log book was simply lost and it has never been on the computer system then that will be a dead-end.

    DVLC most certainly didn't ask local authorities for copy records relating to 70 years worth of registrations , mostly for vehicles that no longer existed.

    I don't believe there is any evidence that DVLA ever have or intend to re-sell old registration numbers..there are enough permutations of the modern sequences.

    Initially, it was quite straightforward to put older vehicles onto the system, but it was exploited to a criminal degree by the parasites who call themselves Number Plate Dealers. I've seen motorcycles with thirty or so frame numbers stamped on them. At one time, they  accepted tax discs, but that was fiddled too and now the burden of proof is extremely high..

×
×
  • Create New...