paul connor

Thanks Colt. That is good to know that someone has got around this.

I do keep following eBay, GPSV, Withams, etc. But the prices end usually far too high for adding the VAT, auction fees and 10% import duty, then haulage. Usually taking a vehicle to nearly 40k in Euros.

Hello,

I am still trying to find a LHD 90 Wolf, with not much luck so far, but that is another story. When I do locate one I will be registering it in Germany, which may require a Certificate of Conformity.

Would this exist for the Wolf being that it was not a direct production line vehicle as such? Or would the MOD cast form work for this?

Any leads on a Wolf 90 LHD would be much appreciated - ideally in the EU, as I am now subject to VAT on import plus 10% which makes UK vehicles less viable, especially when you then add the collection or haulage of the vehicle.

Many thanks

Paul

If I remember correctly it was wheels on a trailer, which were for sale?

If that was the post it is likely to have been taken down post-sale.

That is of course if that is the correct post I remember.

Welcome to HMVF :)

If anyone knows where this vehicle is now, which was last know as Scotland in 2003, then please let me know, I'd be interested to buy it back.

Shows as SORN, but no MOT history. So might be in a field or stored, or scrapped and database isn't up to date.

Paul

I am sure many 109 HVVPKs were cast, as I have images of around 15 of them at shows, and a friend had 2 for a long time in his field, all complete other than radio and early ECM gear. They seemed common place for sale around 2000, just now gone, it would be a shame if they are all scrapped!

I remember when I was about to buy my first MV, which was around 1999/2000, there was an abundance of 109 HVVPK & VPK vehicles for sale, where have they all gone?

I regret selling my first MV, which was a HVVPK 109 (JAW ***W?) which went to Scotland and was never seen again. I remember the chap bought it blind over the phone after a lengthy conversation, paying in full, then came by train two months later! He simply jumped in the vehicle and drove it to Scotland.

I can imagine many saw the scrap pile, or were stripped to become civilian spec for resale value.

How many do we have on the forum, out of curiosity ?

Hello Cliv, 

Really sorry, I read it and it solved my questions perfectly.  I was then sidetracked at work and closed the browser window and totally forgot to reply! 

Thanks again, albeit a bit late!

Paul

How unusual. I was going to suggest it looks like a Ford Canadian Military Pattern truck, just from the wheel spacing and the radiator placement, but that is a wild guess. It does look as if the name would indeed reflect the driving experience.

Andy, you quite literally got all the information you asked for. I made some calls and confirmed that Oxford Archaeology surveyed the area and there are no buried tanks under any part of the site. 

So you got exactly what you asked for, 100% scientific confirmation that there is zero possibility of buried vehicles. 

I'm sorry that's not to your liking, but any other answer would be simply untrue. The only thing you're not trying is to actually listen to what I keep telling you.

Mystery solved. Case closed. No tanks buried on that site.

That's the difference, Andy, your tale has been disproved with scientific evidence; GPR and Res survey of the whole site by Oxford Archaeology. Yet you continue to suggest you're being disregard and that my reply (and others) are linear and will not change - that's simply not true. I work within a scientific field and my theories continually change, that's the nature of science.

But, when your tale is subject to archaeological fieldwork that disproves the whole thread, where do we go? As you'll not accept any evidence, yet it is an apparent obsession based on oral testimonies and mild paranoia for the state.

You're suggesting ridiculous ideas, the Churchill MBT being manufactured out side of the UK for a start. And stating that on a military vehicle forum is really the worst stage to damage your credibility.

I think I would be better of debating this with my sheep.

Wow, that's some extensive research right there. An aerial photograph with no contextual source, and a graph from 'miketodd.net' suggesting historical exchange rates; with no sources and completely subjectively bias text.

Please Andy, learn to understand bias and agenda. Your subjective views are not quantifiable, websites are also not valid as references within any academic or amateur research.

You're using dubious sources to arrange a very inconsistent and unconvincing argument to project your own personal narrative and agenda within this thread.

It's probably best this thread is locked.

Hello,

I was wondering if people could help with a few questions?

1.The Bowman antenna bases that are on the Wolf 90/110 front wings - are these simply attached to the wing mounting brackets that were for Clansman ATUs (RRC8359) or do they have a spacer or specific piece between?

2. The Clarke 8m mast brackets for the rear wing/panel - how are these attached, are they simply bolts and a strengthener piece behind - is there a fitting kit instructions EMER?

3. What is the difference in Bowman antenna base, as some have a thread coming from the spring in the centre, others appear a female attachment, is there a specific for locations, IE wings and side mast supports?

Many thanks

Paul

Not in this fable, nothings off the table.

You need to look harder, Matt W

19 minutes ago, ferretfixer said:

That's amazing! My Dog Talks to Me all the time, about a spectrum of Topics!

But I take what he tells Me. With a pinch of salt. As  Everyone knows He's a Liar!..... 🤣

I have six sheep here in Germany, and they are always talking about buried tanks in a field they used to graze in, with remarkable detail. Olga, she is 9 now, suggested that there is a Panzerkampfwagon II, a Jagdpanzer achtunddreißig, and two Sonderkraftfahrzueg zwei buried in the corner under some brambles. Her father's friend saw that happen in the 50s, who told her and drew a plan on the ground with his hoof. She did suggest another area with Stermgeschütz Drei guns buried, but I think she is exaggerating with that second claim.

I once found a panel from the Amber Room while I was digging drainage in one of my fields, but it was not to my taste so I used my digger and front loader to break it up and put in a 20 ton container. It was terrible gaudish.

On a serious note, I did find a wheel from a GMC CCKW in a field locally with a 1944 dated tyre. Can someone please help me start a thread on that - as must be cover up! Nothing to do with being close to Wittmundhafen airfield and post war occupation, it has to mean something!

Andy, here is an example of hindsight and hearsay mixed with oral testimonies.

While some of the information might be true from below, the much is lost in passage of time. We do not always quite remember events as they actually happened, rather our own subjective experiences within those events, which later we paste together to present a subjectively bias story for effect. 

Statement: I was at the War and Peace show 2003, when approached by an elderly gentleman who drove my ‘Saracen’ in Northern Ireland. He was very knowledgeable and knew the vehicle well. Presenting stories of ramming things and being shot at.

Reply: It was a Humber FV1612 Mk1 Pig, I owned it and I am pretty sure I was right. A Saracen has 6 wheels, not 4 and although I pointed this out, I was just a "stupid young man", how dare I challenge him.

Statement: I met an old gentleman while I was surveying some WW2 structures, who told me the pillboxes in the field I was in, were for shooting down Axis aircraft, which followed the river north to London. "That is how they navigated, you know?".

Reply: Type D F/W 24 pillboxes are for stop line defence, you cannot fire vertically inside one, even if you tried. Furthermore, the Axis did not bomb the UK with a road atlas as a guide. Subjective oral testimonies at their best.

Statement: When I was in Seaford surveying a fuel pumping station, I was told this was a flame fougasse (sea flame barrage for the sea, wrong name for a start), which would have been ignited had an invasion come. He remembered them testing it.

Reply: It was a fuel pump station for sea planes. Nothing to do with defence. No sea barrage defence in that area, as it was proved to be useless at the testing phase. None every tested in Sussex at all.

Statement: While generating data for a 3D rendering of a pillbox I was told by an elderly man walking a dog that these were built and manned by the Home Guard.

Reply: Pillboxes were to be manned with regular soldiers; by July/August 1940 when most pillboxes were built the LDV were in no position to defend stop lines. The main armament of such structures being Boys ATG, Bren LMG and small arms of which the LDV had very few. There was a large regular and TA force, as well as Canadian, Australian and New Zealand forces tasked with the invasion threat.

Statement: While sitting in a Land Rover XD Wolf 110, I was told by a REME veteran that I was in a Land Rover Series 3 Long Wheel base.

Reply: While at the Army recruiting day, in the RE Land Rover, I was quite sure that when we left the barracks that day, it was a Wolf, it certainly was at first parade and when it was signed out?

Statement: While recording a pillbox in Sussex, I was told how there was a 12-pounder artillery piece in this particular pillbox and he remembers them test firing it when he was a child.

Reply: The D F/W type 28 pillbox I was working at, which was fitted for a 6lb Hotchkiss QF gun, that was never actually fitted, could never accommodate a 12-pounder. The rear doorway is 1m wide and the embrasure too narrow for the barrel to traverse. Furthermore, home defence didn’t have such guns in this area at all during 1940-1941 which were tasked with stop line defence.

Oral testimonies are as dangerous as conspiracy theories, as in the modern era they are accepted with no quantifiable evidence. This is very prevalent in WW2 Archaeology, as everyone is an arm-chair-expert armed with the conversations of the past and the internet search engine. Thankfully I do not encounter this as much with prehistory!

"My mates Dad knapped that arrow head, he was firing at a bear over there, I remember it, it was black bear, it was a Tuesday. We buried some tanks afterwards under an apron. Good times back in the Neolithic, you've got it easy now. Cheese burgers were a penny then".

Andy,  please pause, and read the following, stop your internal dialogue, critically analyse and think objectively:

"There hasn't been much other than assumptions and a will to do a demolition on me" - There are no assumptions, the data from Oxford Archaeology is 100% quantifiable. This proves there are no tanks on the site. I am sorry, but that is just scientific fact; denying that you may as well suggest the world is flat and Big Foot is thriving in the Lake District.

"Ever present shadow of Hammond hovering in the background" - I will try and not sound too harsh with this, but your fixation on this MP is not healthy. I am sure they don't even give you a second thought, never mind actively plotting against you. You are fixated, and if you continue to press unwanted attention and deformation of this person online, suggesting corruption and foul-play you may find yourself in trouble with the authorities.

"Just a few showing their frustration" - Yes, I would say you are frustrating people, as your story changes with the wind, and you refuse to accept any evidence at all other than your memories of conversations. Your posts are erratic, irrational and lack context, you are refusing to accept clear evidence when it is presented; and it is clear that even if the aprons were lifted you would adjust your story to suit you bias agenda, suggesting a reason or new location.

https://www.skillsyouneed.com/learn/critical-thinking.html

Please, read the above link, and maybe try and understand how and why your views are subjective, why you are influenced by personal agenda above factual data, and how this directly moulds your interpretation.

4 minutes ago, andy brown said:

A few excerpts from..

August 1948 cabinet preparations for defence

Memorandum by the prime minister

The defence of the United kingdom

Defence of essential communications

Defence of middle east

Bases for u.s strategic air force in UK and middle east stocking of Airfields in EAST ANGLIA 

Should war break out ,or its threat become imminent at any time in the next six to nine months ,fairly extensive plans have already been prepared ,and are being perfected every week - for a crash mobilisation..

Specific attention to the recall of war time A/A crews where ever possible 

Actions in response to the meetings of foreign ministers in Moscow promote the need to safeguard what we have and under take to supply what will be needed

Anti aircraft ammunition 

The rate of production should be built up to the following level

5.25he.       10.000 per month

3.7mark 1v he 5000per month

3.7mark111 he. 30,000 per month 

Small arms ammunition should be raised from 200 million rounds to 400 million

Bomber airfields ....

Four additional airfields should be prepared in the UK for the use of U/S heavy bombers 

Fighter aircraft 

Additional orders placed for jet fighters venoms and or meteors ,..piston engine fighters held in sock to be bought to a state of readyness and supply's of spares will be required for same...

The lists go on covering everything from steel production shipping refurs ,radar up grades , labour distribution ,.construction materials ,production of respirators ,vehicle produçtion , etc,ect 

So this was pie in the sky ....according to the g and t Oxford brigade ....

 

Send me the TNA reference please, so I can read and interpret this objectively.

Hi Alec,

Geoarchaeological samples were taken, although I have not read that report. If there was anything suggesting scale contamination my friend would have informed me, as we were talking about the fantasy idea of buried vehicles. So, unless they are around 40m down, which isn't possible, the only tanks located at the site are for fuel and water. 

I guess we never asked the most obvious question - what scale were the tanks that he buried? 1:32, 1:48, 1:72?

Still no tanks there. 

The GPR data from Oxford Archaeology already proves there is nothing under the apron, only geological deposits. That is your proof right there, which part of that statement do you not understand? I have checked the data myself, or am I mistaken, underqualified or a liar?

You are wrong, 100% wrong. There is no debate here! within the boundaries of that site there are no tanks buried. So unless you head there with your own digger and put some there tomorrow, there will still be no tanks there today, tomorrow, or in 50 years. 

Just to recap - there are no tanks there. 

PS. No tanks.

PPS. Still no tanks. 

No tanks there.

Don't mention Churchill, he was in on this from the start!

My reply used the word 'afraid' as an adjective, not in the literal sense of fear of phobia. It was me politely introducing my disagreement to your evidence;  stating that context, much like your argument throughout this thread, is missing. As for the rest of your reply, well, it is as illegible as your evidence for buried tanks, unfortunately. 

Yes, that shows some plates were sold, that you were likely the seller. That is where this exciting new piece of evidence ends I am afraid.