Jump to content

fv1609

Members
  • Posts

    11,502
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    31

Posts posted by fv1609

  1. I have accurate line drawings of both Mk1 and Mk2, both depict close fitting duck boards that look to need just a flat unobstructed floor.

    That page from the 1954 FVRDE catalogue I believe is incorrectly labelled as Mk2. The swaged X sides were characteristic of Mk1, whereas Mk2 had plane sides. 

    The same picture & description appears in the 1956 catalogue but with the reference to Mk2 deleted & now designated 2W/1L.

    The same picture (although doctored) appears in the 1962 edition & called Mk1.

    The details of the differences between the two Mks are covered in EMER WHEELED VEHICLES U 209 Misc Instr No.1 

    If you tell me the contract I can tell you if it is Mk1 or Mk2.

    To further complicate matter trailers FV 2301(A) 2W/1L were redesignated as FV 2308(A) Mk2, although there was no Mk1 in the FV 2308 series.

    • Like 1
  2. 21 hours ago, colin attewell said:

    Hi is it for sale or could i have a copy thanks colin

    Not for sale & I'm afraid scanning is too time consuming. But I don't mind scanning a few pages if there is some particular detail you need.

    Is yours or what you are trying to emulate, a Mk7 or Mk7/1 or Mk7B? The differences of the later variants are covered in EMER ENGINEERING & MISCELLANEOUS L 310/1 Equipment, Remote Handling, Tracked, EOD (Wheelbarrow), All Marks & Variants. Data Summary. Sep 1982
    L 313/1 Equipment, Remote Handling, Tracked, EOD (Wheelbarrow), All Marks & Variants. Unit & Field Repairs. Aug 1982
    L 317/1 Equipment, Remote Handling, Tracked, EOD (Wheelbarrow), All Marks & Variants. Modifications No. 1-19

  3. Well spotted but I think the seller has misunderstood that all these photos  marked 17.10.68 on the back relate to the date that the previous owner absorbed them into his collection by writing his name & address on the back. As such give an impression that these were all photographed on 17.10.68 which is clearly unlikely.

    It is quite possible that the photos were manufacturer manipulated. I think I have seen a similar sort of thing with Swingfire missiles added to a Saracen.

     

  4. Paul I could never find one for a 90 so I used one for a 110. The front part is the same & I had to cut down the rear section.

    When searching be aware that sometimes they are sold as a "winterisation kit" I don't know if the seller is being thick or they are looking for buyers who are thick.

    Note also the term "curtain" sometimes crops up, as it does in some AESPs.

    • Like 1
  5. I know nothing about WW2 British paint, which I know is the title of the thread, but at times the painting of British vehicles in the post-war period has been touched upon. This subject has been of great interest to me, here again is a detailed analysis of changes that I compiled a few years ago.

    The download link https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y3icx5761al00u9/AACGqQrN2TXeNJfPce5kqLtia?dl=0

    Or if you prefer not to download it can be viewed on line here:

    https://www.militarylightweight.co.uk/british-army-green-paints/

  6. On 7/12/2023 at 10:55 PM, 10FM68 said:

    I may be wrong, but I think paint, war equipment wasn't a vehicle paint.  It was the paint approved for 'bits and pieces'

    You are not wrong at all. There was no OD paint listed as a "vehicle paint" in VAOS/COSA Section H1(a) Paints dopes & varnishes, this is further confirmed by EMER WORKSHOPS N 251. Extracts below show that there were a range of specific OD paints for particular purposes including war equipment, steel helmets, jerricans & storage boxes. There is no entry for OD under vehicle paints.

    ODWE.thumb.jpg.f168875f25c0000969895e355849dc4b.jpg

    ODSH.thumb.jpg.9dbe847bf89be4dc219855d226ec1849.jpg

    ODJN.thumb.jpg.0016d63a57573733daabce181aa3f36b.jpg

    • Like 2
  7. Just got back from my 460-mile round trip, as always well worth it. Very enjoyable event, many thanks to the hard working organisers whom I suspect had little time to fully relax at the show with tasks & responsibilities to manage. Looking forward to next year's event.

    • Like 2
  8. That list was compiled from various vehicle parts lists but also cross-referencing to several Lockhead catalogues where part numbers were regularly superceded that adds to the difficulty in following up equivalents which themselves are unlikely to have been made recently.

    If your bore is rusty & needs re-sleeving you might consider a complete cylinder. Check with the seller but I think you will find this is the same:

    https://marcusglenn.com/parts/daimler-ferret-fv-700-series/ferret-brake-master-cylinder

  9. 4 hours ago, Terra1936 said:

    Thanks. Yes hoses are not a problem. Finding the crossovers are. What master cylinder service kit would I ask for and where? 

    Master cylinder repair kit (1½ in.bore) KL71414, Bedford: Z1404
    Master cylinder with fittings, LV6/MT1/AU/LK33231, FV17207
    (Same as on Morris MRA1)
    (Same as Kew Dodge 1940 30/40 CT, 2 Ton, ¾ Ton, & 2/3 Ton 1947-51)
    Master cylinder assembly, with push rod of various types, Lockhead 15054, 15055, 15056, 13827. BMC: 2H2697
    Master cylinder assembly, less push rod, Lockhead 10951, BMC: 17H7090, Chrysler/Dodge: D13470
    Master cylinder main cup 1½ in., LV6/MT9/AU/LK563, Lockhead 563,
    BMC: 7H7020, Rootes: K19310, Ford: 208179, Chrysler/Dodge: T1315
    Master cylinder secondary cup, 1½ in., LV6/MT9/AU/LK14562, Lockhead 14562.
    BMC: 7H7204, Bedford: 7054166, Rootes: K19313, Ford: 208178, Chrysler/Dodge: D13070
    Master cylinder valve assembly, Lockhead 88037, BMC: 17H7422, Rootes: K19306, Chrysler/Dodge: D16397/7
    Master cylinder boot, LV6/MT1/AU/LK30129, Lockhead 1778,
    BMC:7H7035, Bedford:7053604, Rootes: K19317, Chrysler/Dodge: T1324
    Master cylinder piston, Lockhead 1771, BMC: 7H7032, Rootes: K19493, Chrysler/Dodge: T1313A

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
×
×
  • Create New...