Jump to content

super6

Members
  • Posts

    177
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by super6

  1. Land Utility denotes an agricultural type tyre and normally the tractor so fitted, I believe. The tractors shown in thread and on face book have double fillers for petrol/tvo and appear to be standard agriculture tractors as also used by the RAF. Early, and later, RAF Fordsons were based on the industrial chassis with forward driving position, LU tyre equipment, no mudguards, under slung exhaust, lights and horn powered from a battery only, single filler for petrol and therefore a straight petrol engine with gauze type air filter. They were capable of around 30 mph when fitted with 28" rear tyres............. scary I reckon. See Vintage Tractor Special no.s 4 and 11, by A T Condie for more pictures and information.

  2. Thanks Rob. A few more questions for you. I presume the round goes in through the conical end after the breech block is opened/lifted and is held in by breech block and rim as per .303 cartridges. When it is fired does a portion of the propellant gas get diverted out the back to counteract the recoil? Is the shell case ejected upon opening/lifting the breech block?

  3. What sort of ammunition does this fire, is it separate components or a one piece round? How is it actually fired as there doesn't seem to be anywhere for the firing pin to be mounted? Rim fired? for want of a better expression!

    It looked very ungainly behind the carrier, not very well balanced at all being tail heavy. Does the hitch have any affect on the barrel life? and is it rifled?

  4. I was lucky enough to see both at the Goodwood Revival on the Sunday. Thought I was going to be disappointed at first, following the engine problems of earlier, as when they made there first pass, coming from a southerly direction, I could only see one aircraft, then Vera came out from behind the trees that were obscuring my vision of her.

    A pleasant surprise and a fantastic sight :-)

     

    I now know why she is called Vera, is this an official name?

    My thanks to all those involved with bring her over here, I trust they all got home okay.

     

    Does anyone know if the Mustang got back home okay following her under carriage problem? :shocked:

  5. You could try Cox and Turner Engineering, Yeovil or another by the same name based in Fordingbridge. They may even be the same company. I do not have any experience with these companies and have only come across the former at some vintage tractor events.

  6. It is not as daft as it might seem, many vehicles of that era used a purely "thermosiphon" cooling system, relying on natural convection. In fact in the book "The Bennett College of Motoring" from around 1914 seems to be of the opinion that such systems are superior.

     

    Fordson E83W's had a thermo-syphon cooling system and they were built from 1938 to 1957 although a water pump was available as an optional extra for some markets

  7. Just measuring up for the timber and noticed the 1" thick floor planking was not tight between the 7/8 "side planking, but is an inch narrower overall. Is this normal to allow for swelling or just shrinkage from age? I am planning to use oak. Any advice appreciated.

    Sean.

    Oak is acidic so use stainless or brass fixings

    see here

    http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=fOwCGQnObxgC&pg=PA36&lpg=PA36&dq=is+oak+timber+acidic&source=bl&ots=FDXDB4FN4C&sig=FNF2IyXHNfATpUL5q7207YGwdg8&hl=en&sa=X&ei=44ckU7LVDuPF0QXE3IHgDg&ved=0CDwQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=is%20oak%20timber%20acidic&f=false

  8. I think the Austins had twin drive shafts so maybe not that make of chassis.

     

    I stand corrected, not wishing to sow disinformation. In my defence I only Goggled Austin Armoured Cars and viewed the images. Upon viewing again, and looking at more, the image I chose is also listed as a Peerless.........:banghead: It does appear to show the deep 'chassis' rails though.

×
×
  • Create New...