Jump to content

REME 245

Members
  • Posts

    1,000
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by REME 245

  1. I understand for example with a vehicle like the Saxon that after carryingout a MOD to approximately half the fleet to remove Abestos Brake Shoes they had to stop because the braking efficency was found to be worse than the original testing results.  This obviously left half the fleet off the road until the problem could be resolved.  

    The main driver for the Bull Dog conversion was presumably to remove the obsolete and inefficent engine and transmission which relied on a single set of Abestos brake shoes to both steer and brake the vehicle.  This was also incontravention of Construction and Use Regulations due to the lack of a secondary braking system.

    The original question on this thread refered to engine covers and I would still be very surprised even with crown imunity if the MOD contined using a hazardous material on easialy accessible items like engine covers years after it became illegal and the health issues well known.

  2. The use of any components containing Abestos was banned from November 1999 so as commented above unless a vehicle has not been through a rebuild in at least 22 years it will not contain Abestos.  Things like brake linings on a 432 may be an exception but the MOD and other employers have paid out millions of pounds in compensation on asbestosis claims and would not knowingly use the material now without very good cause.    The material in picture looks lke the modern glass fibre type replacement material.   I am sure any thing put out on ranges now is also fully surveyed to satisfy the green agenda.

    If that is your vehicle in the picture you are legally responsible for the disposal of any hazardous materials.

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...