Jump to content

CVRTNick

Members
  • Posts

    83
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CVRTNick

  1. Long story short,me & truck (1959/M55) went down to the all new Beltring-on-sea & with just 1/4 a mile to go,the big end went!It was towed in by some Dutch guy's,who said that ex-Dutch army truck's had the same engine (R6602 10L petrol) and post release were re-engined with diesel,so any lead's?

  2. Sorry for the lateness of reply but pre-Beltring my pc went U/S & am now back online.As it was a bit "damp" the first half, (arrived to mud left in dust!) I didn't get to see your new toy close up,but from the pic's she's way different to how she was & all Kudos to you for not going down the usual Bang 1-2-3 route,In conclusion great,superb & "nice"!

  3. I would have thought the REME museum would be all over this,applying for a lottery grant, launching an appeal in order for a new building next it (near them if no room) for a new building to house the collection undercover + a arena like Bovy’s (to draw the punters in) & long-term a workshop building where Friends of the REME museum (like Bovington has) could restore things.I just hope its your cunning plan...

  4. I thought it was the combo of the turret rings on the Allies tank were too small to be upgunned (with the 76mm & 17prd exceptions ) & most German tanks in the ETO (European theatre of operations) were taken out by anti-tank guns,but the Allies tanks during WWII were “questionable”.With the allies it was a numbers game,the Germans built a small number of good tanks,I think they worked on (I think) 6-4 Shermans per Tiger (pity being in the first Shermans!)

    RE the Russians,the Panther was a German take on the T34!Plus the engineering went the other way,I think the AK47 was influenced by the MP44 & the RPG (rocket propelled Grenade) was influenced by the German Panzerfaust & US bazooka.

    But I stand to be corrected.

  5. Any vehicle pre-1960 or ex an MOT due to being tracked,has to be up to MOT standards (so rather than the gov doing a check via a currant MOT its down to you to be roadworthy (otherwise things like insurance cover goes south!).

  6. Well a short distance yes but given (given the obvious cost of fuel & the more hidden one of track wear,my take on the law is if you damage the highway in a tracked vehicle you pay to have it fixed!) & long dis (on the back of a beavertail HGV).Military vehicles are not known for their MPG (my 50s M55 has a 10L petrol lump & a wastepaper size carb with a grease nipple & does 3mpg!)

  7. I had the 432 v CVRT argument years ago & as I only had access to a 2 axel beavertail HGV to move it (max load 12ton,I think),went down the lighter CVRT route.Aside from being well under width (1970s CVRT is under 2m wide) and having separate driving & brake systems,does it meet C&U regs?

  8. You are caught in the ongoing war between “good Mike” & “bad Mike”,the WLF is their latest battleground, good luck with that!The lorry body looks okay except I take it sans floor,do they intent to scrap or repair it?

×
×
  • Create New...