Jump to content

fv1609

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,569

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    35

 Content Type 

Everything posted by fv1609

  1. fv1609
    2 minutes behind!
  2. fv1609
    Yes, well done Wayne! Good deduction & research knowing my tendancies. It is officially: FV4010 Heavy Tank Destroyer GW Carrier Here it is with missile at the ready.
  3. fv1609
    Nope, none of these roles.
  4. fv1609
    Nope, not any form of recovery.
  5. fv1609
    Nope.
  6. fv1609
    Yes well done it is indeed. So nearly there now.
  7. fv1609
    Not 432 series
  8. fv1609
    Nope, a bit later.
  9. fv1609
    It isn't a turret as such but it was a hatch that allowed access to this special equipment which I have removed from the diagram otherwise it would have been a giveaway. Technical problems here. I may be slow to respond, broadband dropped out earlier today. It is back, it used to be 4.2 mps then we had a new telephone cable it dropped to 1.8 mps now it is worse than dial up at 17 kps:argh::argh::argh:
  10. fv1609
    Other versions of this tank were quite common.
  11. fv1609
    Not railways.
  12. fv1609
    Non, elle n'est pas pour un chemin de fer.
  13. fv1609
    Tank yes but not mine clearing. It as for a specialist role, but not mine clearing.
  14. fv1609
    Despite the comprehensive reasoning I'm afraid its not one of those.
  15. fv1609
    Non, elle est Anglais.
  16. fv1609
    Not a bad idea but nope.
  17. fv1609
    Nope.
  18. fv1609
    Nope.
  19. fv1609
    Nope. (Oliver North? I'm afraid the only one I know of gained some noteriarty in the US Army)
  20. fv1609
    Warm Tony, but not really. Perhaps this helps:
  21. fv1609
    Yes it is vehicle, Richard. Yes periscopes, but I'm not sure how/if cupolas hinge.
  22. fv1609
    Bit bigger than that. Radio 4? Wayne, showing your age a bit.
  23. fv1609
    Well a few of these do get won through recognition rather than deduction. No shame in that, you can't "un"recognise it & pretend you don't know what it is! Although I'm not sure how many will recognise MO 127!
  24. fv1609
  25. fv1609
    Yes it is indeed, well done Tony
×
×
  • Create New...