Jump to content

Chris Suslowicz

Members
  • Posts

    504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chris Suslowicz

  1. Dingo 19 set shouldn't have decals because they are on Canadian or USA sets. The best possible combination is:

     

    - British Mk III T 19 set (normal ones are difficult to find, but this is nearly impossible to find, that's why most have Can. sets)

    - Canadian Mk III PU (viberator version make less noise when receiver is working)

    - Vario meter with special adaptor to go through the hull straight into the A set aerial support bracket.

     

    Regards

     

    Peter Hommes

    www.milmarket.org

     

    It gets a bit more complicated....

     

    WW2 period will have whichever WS19 was current at the time, for Dingo probably a British manufactured set but lend-lease ones would have been used in the event of supply shortages. Any major damage to the set would result in it being swapped for a new/refurbished one of the same "Mark", or set and supply unit if necessary. The fitting of the Canadian supply unit No.2 as a replacement was late WW2/postwar for noise/power consumption/repair reasons. (It was also fitted to 24V "2-wire" vehicles if they needed a 12V "tap" to run a WS38AFV.

     

    Post-WW2 a lot of the decals were simply painted over to hide the cyrillic lettering, and later had the front panels refinished at base workshops during major overhauls.

     

    Aerial feeder No.4 is used on the Dingo. This is the shorter "conduit" type also used on a lot of tanks for "through the turret roof" mounting. (The No.5 is longer to accommodate thicker armour.)

     

    Chris.

  2. The "spacer" is an insulated centering plate to make sure the aerial feeder is kept clear of the metalwork. Depending on what type of base is in use (and where it's mounted) you may also want a rubber gasket to stop water tracking under the base and getting into the vehicle. Some bases have a plain metal mounting flange, others are rubber coated.

     

    "gten98" on eBay will almost certainly have any bits you need; he's certainly got the thick stranded wire used to connect the aerial base to the ATU output terminal (it's not co-ax), and did have the plastic insulator "bowls" in packs of 100 that are threaded over the wire to maintain clearance from any metalwork.

     

    Chris.

  3. Post photos please!

     

    (Most of the sets that look new are probably unissued (US lend lease) or REME workshop rebuilds. I don't think the US or Canadian decal sets were available in any great quantity and the British sets had silk-screened lettering when new or rebuilt (or hand painted/rubber stamped lettering for partial rebuilds)).

     

    Chris.

  4. ...

    To cut a long story short, my friend bid for me and am now the owner of another Lightweight trailer for restoration.

     

    I'd thought about starting new thread, but as this one has a lot of other info about 10cwt British WWII trailers, I'll just continue here as a resource in one place

    I believe the Trailer, 2-Wheeled, Lightweight Type, “Electric Welding” was one of the original four types developed by the REME for the Airborne divisions (the other being the Electrical Repair; the Machinery and the Generator, 5K.W.).

     

    Dont know much about the "MUREX" welding trailer.....so any info will be welcome.

     

    Admit it: you're just trying to collect the full set! :D

     

    Seriously, very well done and I admire your skill and determination. The Electrical Repair Trailer rebuild was a work of Craft (not just Art).

     

    Chris.

  5. Hi

     

    Does anyone have any info on the types of aerial used on early carriers fitted with a WS 11. I think the diameter may be 7/8 but I'm not sure.

     

    Lots of info on WS 19 but almost none on the WS11.

     

    Thanks in advance

     

    Ben

     

    Signal Training Volume III Pamphlet No.19 is reasonably (!) comprehensive. :-D

     

    Page 12:

     

    "The aerials used with Wireless Set No.11 are similar in form to those used with Wireless Set No.1, but rods 7/8-in. diameter are employed. The set may be used with vertical rods up to a maximum of 21 ft.,or 15 ft. with "top". The "top" employed is that already in use with Wireless Set No.1 (which is joined to the 7/8-in. rods by a special adapter provided for that purpose), viz. four 3-ft. 3/8-in. diameter spokes.

     

    For working over longer ranges half-wave horizontal aerials may be used, viz. :--

     

    i. Horizontal, half-wave, single feeder, matched impedance type (commonly known as the Wyndom aerial).

    ii. Horizontal half-wave end-fed type.

     

    These two aerials are discussed in detail in Chapter IX."

     

    (I'm _not_ going to type in Chapter IX, thankyouverymuch. The whole manual can be requested from the WS19 group in the usual way. (Doc 5088 to save you hunting for it.) :D

     

    Appendix 3 of Wireless for the Warrior Volume 2 lists a lot of aerial components used with the WS11:

     

    3, 4 & 6-ft, 7/8" diameter Dural (Aerial Rods "D")

    3, 4 & 6-ft, 5/8" diameter Steel (Aerial Rods "E") - for animal pack station

     

    Aerial Rods "F" as used with the WS19, etc.

     

    Aerial Rods D Kit No.1 (18-ft set in dural for ground station)

    ditto No.2 for vehicle station (I assume the supplied base in the kit is different - the ground station probably uses Insulator W/T 'B').

     

    Masts, Dural, 4-ft and 10-ft

     

    Aerial bases used were No 2 (spring mounted Ebonite), No.3 (Flexible rubber), both for the "D" rods, and No.4 for "E" rods.

     

    ---------

     

    Aerial Rods 'D' still turn up today as part of the 34-ft mast kit used with the WS19 (or the 32-ft kit for the WS62), but the rods will be steel instead of Duralumin and 3-ft in length. I suspect all the alloy ones have rusted away or been melted down by now.

     

    Chris.

  6. Actually I forget. In the absence of a working I/C circuit, there was, for Scorpion, an Emergency Crew Control, a separate handset that allowed the commander to talk to the driver. It was battleship grey and looked like something out of 1950s TV football commentary or, as I put it, a grey toffee apple.

     

    That's the "Double button carbon microphone" or Tannoy microphone whch pre-dates the Scorpion (and possibly WW2).

     

    The Emergency Crew Control microphone is identical to the "Apparatus Loudspeaking" used to control 25 pdr gun batteries: a big die-cast microphone with a 3-pin connector on the end of the cable. The same microphone was used in the early WW2 AFVs for driver intercom (as a limited number of slip-rings in the turret junction box only left two spare lines, for intercom (speech) and buzzer (signal)). Once later tanks had more connections between turret and hull, they switched to using standard headsets (with different Junction, Distribution control boxes) but retained the ECC microphone for the commander to use if the intercom amplifier failed.

  7. Can anybody id this crate please:

     

     

    (Pix removed to preserve bandwidth)

     

    And if anybody says chisels i will ignore you.

     

    I'd say "Small Arms Ammunition", probably .38 or 9mm in small cartons or packets. I had one once, and it had a black painted tin insert with soldered tear-off lid - the hole in the top when the lid was removed was enough to get a hand inside to remove the contents, so I think boxed ammunition, might have been .303 tracer for making mixed belts.

     

    Chris.

  8. Looking better! Suprising it has survived, let alone been published as such documents were 'Most Secret'. Sound ranging was the first artillery detection system capable of giving a bearing that alowed counter battery fire on an unseen target. The other system used was flash spotting. Artillery developed into a science during the Great War, before that it was open sights, point and shoot.

     

    http://nigelef.tripod.com/tgtacqcb.htm

     

    See also Alister Mitchell's page (and article):

     

    http://www.royalsignals.org.uk/articles/SRS/srs.html

     

    The article in that contains more mathematics than most people are likely to ever need!

    (Caution: It's 110 pages and a 20MB download.)

     

    Chris.

  9. I am trying to find out info on the radio and comms equipment that was used in vehicles in NI during the time my Shorland would have served.

     

    I have found some info with the help of Clive but not enough to pin down the specific equipment.

     

    This is what I know so far:

    “The switching for the Pye Westminster & intercom was done in a die cast box adaptation fixed on a plywood board mounted vertically behind the driver.”

     

    "As for the original comms. There was one VHF whip on the rear off side. I am not sure what the radio was, Commers & Pigs used Pye Vanguards on 108 Mc/s.”

     

    “The Shorlands went into storage & were vandalized. Whatever radios they had they were removed. The UDR initially used Pye Bantams wedged into the dash, then A31 with the whip up through the turret. Then when the batches of Mk 3 Shorlands appeared Pye Westminster’s with an intercom system switched in."

     

    Can anyone tell me what manufacture of the A31 would this be? Clansman etc?

     

    And is there any other designations given to this equipment? As I have looked on eBay and found clansman 351/352 and I was wondering if these were the same equipment?

     

    Also would the intercom function on these radios have been used or would a separate system be used? And would this have been used by all 3 crew or just commander and gunner etc?

     

    The only radio/comms stuff in the Shorland was two boxes behind the driver and the aerial base on the back.

    The plug pictured has UK PAT 990416 on it.

     

    Please excuse my lack of knowledge when it comes to radios and comms equipment.

    Thanks

    Tyler.

     

    All of the junction boxes and connectors shown are Larkspur vintage, so you can rule Clansman out for a start!

     

    I'm fairly sure the A31 never existed, and if it did it would be a portable HF radio, so this is a typo for either the WS31, or much more likely the SR A41 manpack set "with the whip up through the turret".

     

    Most of the shown junction boxes can be cleaned up, though you may have to transplant the contents of the diecast boxes into a new outer - they are still available in places.

     

    How big is the aerial base? It could be civilian or military, and is probably still available as surplus.

     

    Chris.

  10. thanks for thet Rob, will go back to the yard and save them.

     

    but what was this round use for ? with a flat end the round would not fly true

     

    Phil

     

    As Rob says, it's a Proof round. Used for test-firing guns to ensure they can stand up to the pressure/stress of firing. The flat end is because you are not interested in the external ballistics (and would much prefer it not to travel very far).

     

    It would indeed make a good door-stop, or a paperweight for the likes of Charles Atlas or Arnie.:-D

     

    Chris.

  11. I see what you are saying but they are all stored in proper approved cabinets and I keep no ammunition at home so unless the FLO suggests different thats the way they stay

     

    I think it makes a huge amount of sense (maybe separate cabinets for live and de-ac, though), given:

     

    1) they're an "attractive item". cf the Cobatton incident.

    2) if they did get stolen, the dibblery would be very unhappy (might get used in hold-ups, etc. by scrotes.)

    3) the replacement cost only ever increases over time.

    4) if it was an "old stye" de-ac it may be impossible to get another one like it.

     

    Chris.

  12. Spot on Chris - did I get a bargain??

     

    I've truly no idea - they're far to heavy for me to lug one around on foot (18kg for the rigging kit!), but it looks complete and in good condition. I shudder to think what they cost the MoD originally, possibly ten times that price.

     

    On balance I'd say it was a good buy, I've seen them offered for £300+:wow:

     

    Chris.

  13. Which mast, have you got a part number for it, since Racal made a shedload (technical term) of masts over the years.

     

    Failing that, what was the eBay lot number?

     

    I've got access to the 1981 antenna catalogue and it probably lists the lengths and weights.

     

    Chris.

     

    Just in case it's the MA-716 (Racal 8m aluminium mast):

     

    Mast - closed length 1.5 metres, weight (in case) 10.2 kg

    Ancillaries (in bag) weight 18.1 kg.

     

    If it was 320973637704 on eBay, then that is the mast and the details are correct.

     

    Chris

  14. I've just bought one with the CES on eBay and need to arrange a courier. Does anyone know the weight of the two packages and the length of the closed mast?

     

    Cheers

     

    Richard

     

    Which mast, have you got a part number for it, since Racal made a shedload (technical term) of masts over the years.

     

    Failing that, what was the eBay lot number?

     

    I've got access to the 1981 antenna catalogue and it probably lists the lengths and weights.

     

    Chris.

  15. Further thoughts:

     

    ZN.2108 is definitely a bogus stores code, I think. (Unless it was reissued for unknown purposes - but if it was _that_ late, why does it not have an NSN instead?)

     

    Also, the end with the buckle is much too short to fit a radio set in any sensible fashion: it's the only adjustable part, so is not intended to be buckled around the WS18/62/68 carrying hoop (assuming the hook is a later addition).

     

    I suspect it's designed as a carrying sling for something long, thin, and fairly heavy, like the Case, Aerials, No.1 for the WS22 (the tubular steel thing about 1.5" diameter that you can stuff full of 'F' rods and fit Aerial Base No.11 to the top of for use on the move).

     

    That was originally issued with Straps, Carrying, 'H', which was 1" webbing all the way, and probably very uncomfortable to carry for long distances,

     

    If you only want the hooks, I can trade it for one of the 'H' straps or something, to save chopping it up.

     

    Chris.

    p.s: the gas mask brass hooks are lighter construction still - much thinner brass sheet.

  16. That is weird.

     

    ZN.2108 is one of the carrying straps for the WS18, (also the WS22, WS62, WS68 and Supply Unit No.5) but that is yet another different variety!

     

    The "original" ZN.2108 strap was a standard cross strap with two loose buckles, two 1" hooks, and a diagonally-attached 1" buckle and short strap at one end of the wide portion. ZN.2107 was the "other handed" version. ZN.2190 (Yes, I suspect a transposition error for ZN.2109) was the waist belt (P08 pattern with riveted-on hinge plates) for the unit (not for WS62 use).

     

    The later harness (which re-used the same VAOS numbers) used standard 'L' pack straps with an added 1" hook and buckle. The waist belt was cut down at the hinge ends and a 1" strap substituted for the full P08 belt.

     

    This is neither one thing nor the other, but may be either an early ZN.2108 with the diagonal strap removed, or made that way as a "Straps, Carrying, 'H'" with a wider shoulder pad for some reason.

     

    There are two varieties of 1" hooks (three or four if you count the nickel and tin plated (the latter is particularly horrible) versions:

     

    The long one (which you have), and the short one (used on the WS38 harness and also the Hooks, Brace) which is nearly triangular.

    (The repro WS38 harness and Brace Hook manufacturers persist in using the wrong hook, which is how you can spot the repro items.)

     

    Best,

    Chris.

  17. Well worth looking about a certain Nautical type insurance firm tried uping my premium to £745!! :wow: The Old Foggies special got that down by £375!! I had to give up my membership of Club 18/30 though.

     

    I don't drive, but have the "pleasure" of sorting out the family car insurance every year. My view is:

     

    1) Most insurance companies will offer a low rate to attract new customers (and get their sales commission), the jack the price through the roof when it's time to renew. (Yes, AA Insurance, I'm specifically pointing the finger at you,)

     

    2) There's a tendency to either try and load unwanted fripperies onto the policy or spam you to death with "special offers". (SAGA)

     

    3) Price comparison sites are all very well (though "Go Compare!" will never see me visit their site because of their incredibly irritating advertising, likewise "Sheila's Wheels" because of the pumped up volume on the adverts - I nave a "Mute" button and am not afraid to use it.)

     

    So it boils down to:

     

    a) Shop around for re-quotes every year.

    b) Do NOT believe the "we have checked and this is definitely the cheapest quote" - The AA after jacking it up by £300+!

    c) Always check to see what they're covering you for.

    d) A large excess (if you're doing your own repairs or the vehicle has low/no resale value) can drop the cost dramatically.

     

    From personal experience (Age Concern, Saga, AA, Swintons, Colonnade and various brokers), LV= are currently a good bet (for family cars at least), and most of the office appears to have switched to them this year.

     

    Just my 0.02 GBP worth.

     

    Chris.

  18. I have acquired a battery box complete with battery for my trailer, unfortunately the old lead acid battery is not holding charge. I want to remove it from the metal battery box so that I can put a newer battery in. The idea is to use the top of the old battery as a cover to hide a newer battery. Has anyone got any tips for removing the old battery without too much damage, or how these are actually constructed. The six individual cells are potted in what appears to be bitumen and the only way I see of getting them out is to slowly dig out the bitumen.

     

    Richard

     

    Ah, it's nowhere near as simple as it appears. The metal cased batteries have an internal plastic/composition case that (i think) is moulded to fit the ribbed metal skin. This case is a single piece with the cell compartments moulded into it. The plate assemblies then fit into the compartments, the lids are sealed in with hot bitumen, after which the connecting bars are dropped over the terminal posts and molten lead poured in to link the cells together into the completed battery, The top is not a single unit in other words.

     

    This method of construction allowed individual cells to be replaced if faulty, or the plate assemblies to be salvaged if the battery itself is dropped/cracked.

     

    If you're really determined to salvage the top as a "dummy" cover it will take a lot of work and some risk, since you will need to dismantle the battery (remove the plate assemblies) to reclaim the cell lids and connector bars, then either cut the top section of the moulded cell compartment off to use as a "lid" or fabricate a replacement. Given the presence of lead compounds, sulphuric acid, etc, plus the involvement of hot pitch and molten lead during the reconstruction, I'm not sure it's worth the effort. (The old wooden batteries had a vulcanised rubber or glass cell unit that was readily removable, which is why some of them survived.)

     

    For the truly determined, there are REME battery shop manuals and EMERs on the WS19 group website:

     

    http://www.royalsignals.org.uk/refEMERs/PwrJ330.pdf

     

    There's also Doc 5222 "Maintenance, Testing & Repair of Lead Acid Batteries, 1st, 2nd, 3rd & 4th Line REME Workshops, August 1944" but that requires a password in the usual way.

     

    Chris.

×
×
  • Create New...