Jump to content

RayT

Members
  • Posts

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by RayT

  1. Indeed Adrian. I even have 298 from the same manufactuer and it's different.

    It also differs on background and application method. And 2 years later looks different again.

    I like my trailer in 298 (although i feel its a bit too green) and the snark doesn't bother me. It would however be nice to get a definitive answer but I don't think it will ever happen.

     

  2. Tey restorations/jeep parts sell a 298 in cromadex which seems popular and used by various restorers. It is vastly different in colour to another 298. 

    Here's the colours plus some paint on the back of a bracket  but from when I don't know. The truck was overhauled in 52 and then a base overhauled in 56.

    20240215_082410.jpg

  3. 2 hours ago, 10FM68 said:

    But why use a colour which you know to be inaccurate when you have gone to such trouble to rebuild an historical vehicle?  It's the same with markings - a wonderfully finished WWII MV and carrying markings it never could have done - more common than it should be - particularly, I fear, with British MVs where there are all sorts of oddities.

    Why do I know it to be inaccurate?

  4. 18 minutes ago, REME 245 said:

    Eau de nil was introduced very late war and was later replaced by sky blue which is still in use.  It will be one of these colours.

    The cylinder head is (as far as i know) original, the freshly painted part is eau de nil. The rebuild date on the engine is 1956. 

    The two colours are a mile apart.

×
×
  • Create New...