Jump to content

Carrier photo tracks not all the way round


Morris C8

Recommended Posts

This is a 'get you home' solution known as 'short tracking' that you use if you have damaged an idler or track and don't have spares available. I agree that the photo was taken on a training excercise as the guys don't look too stressed. It can be employed on most tracked armoured vehicles if necessary. It would normally only be done on one side of the vehicle which again suggests that this photo was of a training excercise.

David

Edited by David Herbert
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most post war heavy armour has the drive sprockets at the back,  including Cent, Conq Chiefly, Chally and most foreign armies. Notable exceptions are Merkava and PZH 2000. Smaller tends to be at front. For APCs it allows exit at the back, with the added bonus of the engine being between the enemy and crew. Best Toby 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually all British WW2 and later cruiser and heavy tanks had rear drive, USA went to rear drive from Pershing onwards and Germany went to rear drive post WW2. Front drive results in either a drive shaft under the turret (raising the profile of the tank) or having the engine at the front which is better for an APC or SP Gun or IFV but less good for a tank as it limits gun depression when cresting a hill and exposes more of the tank if trying to shoot round a corner.

Short tracking is used regardless of front or rear drive and usually only on one side (because of damage) but if the sprocket is not still engaged with the track, that track is not driven or braked and the vehicle is uncontrolable and must be towed on a hollybone drawbar.

It is pretty obvious that the universal carrier shown in the first post is rear drive and so can still be driven but Loyd carriers have sprockets at both ends. The front one drives and brakes but the rear one also brakes to give more positive steering. One could still drive with the rear sprocket out of use but would have to be careful.

TJSB replied faster than me and I agree with his comments.

David

Edited by David Herbert
Added a bit
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...