Jump to content

NEW Track grip tyres, British WW2


RMS

QTY of tyres   

43 members have voted

  1. 1. Number of tyres

    • 5 of 900x16
      21
    • 5 x 10.50 x 16
      5
    • 5 x 11.00 x 20
      15
    • 5 x 9.00 x 13
      2


Recommended Posts

Hi all 

I know a few years ago the subject of new track grip was looked into and sadly was a dead end.

I have been looking into again but going down a slightly different route and basically it can be done. To produce a batch of new 900x16 track grips a possibly 10.50x16 provided  there is sufficient interest to warrant the exercise. The guys Im working with have already made their own Jeep and GMC tyres with their own mould and the tyres have turned out great. Tyres would need to be made in batches of 250 to make it financially feasible. The final cost is not known at the moment as it will all depend on quantity etc. as indication of price a GMC tyre comes in around the £145-165 mark and a 900x16 will use slightly more material. 

It wont happen overnight but if we feel there is a enough interest to do so then the project will start. 

Ideally the tyres would be sold in batches of 4 or 5. i have started a poll to judge volume of interest. 

EDIT = i have added  11.00 x 20 and 9.00 x 13 as we have a serious enquiry for a large number of them already. 

Cheers

 

Baz

Edited by RMS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All British and Canadian 3 tonners and Daimler and Humber Armoured Cars used 10.50 X 20 during the war.  This size was replaced by 1100 X 20 in the 1950's which everyone uses now.  You also have post-war 4 tonners as well and the Green Godess Fire Engines.

There are other war-time tread patterns so it does not have to be Dunlop Trac-Grip pattern, but they need to look good if people are going to pay a premium.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/03/2018 at 6:29 PM, REME 245 said:

All British and Canadian 3 tonners and Daimler and Humber Armoured Cars used 10.50 X 20 during the war.  This size was replaced by 1100 X 20 in the 1950's which everyone uses now.  You also have post-war 4 tonners as well and the Green Godess Fire Engines.

There are other war-time tread patterns so it does not have to be Dunlop Trac-Grip pattern, but they need to look good if people are going to pay a premium.

 

According to the 1945 edition of the War Office publication, Data Book of Wheeled Vehicles, the 10.20-20 tyres were shown as being replaced by 11.00-20 at that time.

  • Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/25/2018 at 6:29 PM, REME 245 said:

All British and Canadian 3 tonners and Daimler and Humber Armoured Cars used 10.50 X 20 during the war.  This size was replaced by 1100 X 20 in the 1950's which everyone uses now.  You also have post-war 4 tonners as well and the Green Godess Fire Engines.

There are other war-time tread patterns so it does not have to be Dunlop Trac-Grip pattern, but they need to look good if people are going to pay a premium.

 

I see 11.00 x 20 tyres are available at the moment for around £250- £275, so we'll see what can be done. needs interest though so pass the word. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might want to consider that the Trac-Grip name was a design that evolved over time. In fact the first ones (in the 30's I think) were just continuous bars that went all the way from one side of the tyre to the other with no link to the next bar. They were slightly S shaped and at a slight angle which presumably made them a bit quieter.

Then they changed to the general design we know but kept varying the shape of the shoulder. Some have the extension of each bar hollowed out where it is on the side of the tyre. Some have a little bite out of alternate bars at the shoulder and alternate bars longer than the ones between them. Later tyres have plain, solid extensions to the bars on the sidewall and relatively square shoulders, which gave way to more rounded shoulders. Eventually some larger sizes had gaps in the bars about 1/3 of the way from the middle of the tyre, I think to give more even wear.

Once you start looking for these differences on period photos, they are easy to see so I won't post pictures here but no doubt everyone will have different preferences !

David

Edited by David Herbert
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will the 900x16's be for WW2 British/Canadian Rims, the reason I as is that most of the War time rims are actually 16.25" in diameter. I believe that post war ones as used on Ferrets etc are 16" diameter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A number of people are using Ferret tyres including my old 12 cab Chevrolet C15A however the beads need to be trimmed or the rims turned down ( an option I decided not to take) so I ground out the bead using an abrasive buffing wheel on a drill, a messy and time consuming operation.

Pete 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If any one wants some 9.00x16 for a Ferret I’ve got some, 7 actually, 2 on rims, 2 with tubes, one which is brand new never been fitted and the other 3 just tyres. All in good condition. I’m thinking of selling them, just wondering what sort of price to put on them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/5/2018 at 7:36 PM, 64EK26 said:

Will the 900x16's be for WW2 British/Canadian Rims, the reason I as is that most of the War time rims are actually 16.25" in diameter. I believe that post war ones as used on Ferrets etc are 16" diameter.

yep the  originals for British rims were slightly bigger, its an age old debate about fitting 16" tyres and there is no definitive answer. i have fitted dozens of tyres on British rims without any problems as have many others, some others have had problem and some people have the wheels turned down a touch on a lathe.

To keep costs within reason we would use an existing  new carcass and have the them moulded with the pattern required so they will most likely be 16". To make a the carcass from a scratch as well would raise the final price significantly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Adrian Barrell said:

I'm not so sure, armoured vehicle owners are notoriously tight.....😀

I wonder what minimum quantity would be seen as viable? Obviously tooling costs, which will be substantial would have to be amortised over the one batch. 

We will look into it.  previously we have found that a batch of 250 warrants the project. we will concentrate on the popular sizes to begin with. but if demand is there anything is possible :thumbsup: 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...