Jump to content

WW1 Peerless lorry restoration


Great War truck

Recommended Posts

Dad machined the Bronze Bush today - left a fairly slack fit for the Shackle Pin as the internal diameter of the Bush will decrease when it is squeezed into the Spring. Started by jacking it in into the Spring - our usual method but it tightened up considerably when it was about half way in. Had to resort to the Press and that finished the job easily.

 

DSCN0074.JPG

DSCN0076.JPG

DSCN0077.JPG

DSCN0081.JPG

DSCN0084.JPG

DSCN0086.JPG

DSCN0087.JPG

DSCN0088.JPG

DSCN0090.JPG

DSCN0091.JPG

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now eyeing up the next job - we have two King Pins that will want tidying up but will be fit to be used again but only one nut for them so the second nut will have to be made. They are 2" A/F and the thread is either 1.42" x16 or maybe 1.40" x16 - depends which one you measure. We have 2" Hex steel in stock so that should be a straight forward job.

DSCN0107.JPG

DSCN0108.JPG

DSCN0109.JPG

DSCN0110.JPG

DSCN0122.JPG

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking now at the Track rod or described in the Parts Book as the Steering Cross Rod. We have recovered a sound one from our "spares Department" but no Clevis Bolts. The Bolts incorporate Greasers. We have another old front axle with these parts still on it but the Clevis Bolts look beyond use again - so at least one has to come out to be used as a pattern for us to make two new ones. One has started to move but needs some more work yet. 

DSCN0111.JPG

DSCN0112.JPG

DSCN0113.JPG

DSCN0114.JPG

DSCN0115.JPG

DSCN0118.JPG

DSCN0119.JPG

DSCN0121.JPG

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just musing on what screw threads Peerless were using at that time, I would have assumed NF for those shackle pins.   The SAE were trying to standardise threads by the middle of the great war (to a US standard) and Peerless had already adopted many of the (non thread) SAE standards so i am guessing by the time this lorry was built it was all NC/NF.  Or is that a foolish assumption?

Dave (S&F)

Edited by Scrunt & Farthing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were lead into a sense of false security about threads when we started the Peerless - by that time we had already done three American trucks - two 1917 Autocars and the 1918 FWD -the threads in the Autocars were all UNC and the FWD was all UNF - so we naturally thought that the Peerless would be one of those two thread systems - in which case we would probably have all the required Taps and Dies for any thread that we would have to make for Peerless. Wrong! We could not identify any of the threads initially that we began to reveal on the Peerless and it was really through this Forum and helpful advice from others that the light dawned that they were UNS.

Another  thing - it seems very likely that our Peerless could have gone through Slough Estates before it was sold on and in which case, the odd British thread appears.

Tony

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is interesting, thanks Tony.  I guess the bigger diameter threads were UNS where they wanted to reduce the pitch (in spite of the diameter) to reduce the depth of the nut whilst keeping the load area high.  It looks like that is what they done on the clevis pins.

I always think it interesting to discover things like this, and re-think what must have been discussed in the drawing office, back in the day. 

Chees, Dave (S&F)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have been watching this post with a great deal of interest, and I have been updating dad with it as far as possible with the isolation rules applied, out of interest if you can get the Smithsonian channel, America in colour, the episode with Ford, firestone and Edison has a great deal on ww1 and the car and truck industry and a convoy of ww1 cross the country, they are often repeated so may be worth a view

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I 'm really pleased that you are enjoying it all. This lock down is a real pain although Dad is definitely making the most of it! I think the target will be to hang the front end as soon as we are all allowed back together. To that end, Dad has everything under control except for the king pin thrust races which are with me. We have four bearings in stock from which we need two.

DSCN8804.JPG.d44262e49035e43a35c773954385fb32.JPG

They have a spherical top which sits in the top of the axle end.

DSCN8806.JPG.27f41aaeca36095f024d494974ced82d.JPG

There are thirteen 5/8" diameter balls in each. Those that we have could do at a pinch but they are a bit ratty so I will order up some replacements.

DSCN8805.JPG.4770e35dc5e1d1c0eebbf3007824560a.JPG

The main problem is that that either through use or corrosion, the races are dimpled. This will make the steering very lumpy as to rotate, the whole weight of the front end must lift.

1374407016_DSCN8804(2).thumb.JPG.162ccaf9023dd91064980eced376d7bc.JPG

Not quite sure what to do about these. I have had a look on line to see if the bearings are still available but have not found anything like yet. They actually look like turned parts so I thought I would try tickling them up with a carbide tool. The results were predictable.....

DSCN8809.JPG.ef4002b3b9e5a148e546826523b943d7.JPG

Does anyone have any suggestions as to what to do next? I could just leave them but it rather goes against the grain!

Steve      :confused:

Edited by Old Bill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Build an assembly with a drive system, plonk it in something full of something like valve grinding paste and just let it turn for a few hours, basically lap them like valve seats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a small universal grinder with an attachement for internal grinding. With a stone dressed conical and with the right diameter it would make an easy job of it. I imagine that someone near you has the right equipment. I would gladly do it for you guys at no charge, if only I were closer.

Regards

Marcel (enjoying this thread very much!)

3.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might be worth thinking about making some out of gauge plate and then hardening them ,or anneal the old ones then machine and reharden .them .I expect the original ones are carbon steel so well within your capabilities     Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I reckon that my CNC lathe with a CBN tool could tickle them back in to shape it it was OK for them to become a little thinner.

(And I am not allowed in to work for 3 weeks,  and expect to run out of things to do)

Edited by andypugh
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, andypugh said:

I reckon that my CNC lathe with a CBN tool could tickle them back in to shape it it was OK for them to become a little thinner.

I seem to recall you have a ball-turning attachment. Could that be fitted with a CBN tool to generate the circular profile? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, andypugh said:

I reckon that my CNC lathe with a CBN tool could tickle them back in to shape it it was OK for them to become a little thinner.

(And I am not allowed in to work for 3 weeks,  and expect to run out of things to do)

CBN would tickle them nicely.  What about 440c SS, and then run up to the proper temperature.   With 440c you will get to the proper hardness for the bearing.  The only problem might be finding a small enough quantity.

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you chaps for all fo your thoughts and comments regarding the thrust race, particularly Marcel for your very kind offer. A trip to Belgium has a lot of appeal at the moment! Your suggestion, Marcel, of the tool and cutter grinder gave me the idea of using my Dremel grinder in the toolpost, later confirmed by Hedd (Brass Cleaner), so this is what I tried this morning:

DSCN8810.JPG.46f7fecabc3b6bb4f19b263c197be974.JPG

The grinding disc has a larger radius than the groove so I set it below centre line on an angle. The groove shape seems to be uncritical as it certainly doesn't match the balls.

DSCN8812.JPG.282b2e3e0915537bb3039d3638a0c262.JPG

With the lathe on bottom speed (25rpm) and a very ginger feed of no more than half a thou every ten revs or so, I had a go.

DSCN8816.JPG.b1416358d55cb4bdd1e6f39cebf297c9.JPG

The result was actually very pleasing.

DSCN8820.JPG.80b6d30f5aad54fb2b906b4d97e0ef23.JPG

Before and after.

DSCN8815.JPG.b24cf620cc7585ae6e2e2fb27a945d6a.JPG

I did two lower races and one upper one as we already have a good one.

DSCN8818.JPG.5d3e21287595f907fd2dcd184cd95c5f.JPG

All very satisfying and some original parts salvaged which is always good news. I have ordered some new balls to go with them.

Than you everyone for all of your ideas!

Steve  :)

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...