Jump to content
  • 0

RAF vehicle camouflage


Rlangham

Question

I've seen this asked on another forum so thought I might give it a go here. In WW2, what colour would the emergency vehicle's at RAF bases (especially the fire tenders) be painted in? The Airfix kit of an Austin K6 fire tender says it should be in red, but the Fordson fire tender I saw the other day was a sort of olive drab, and i've seen models in RAF blue, can anyone help out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Army Cooperation Command used A, which was also used by Airfield Construction after Army Coop ceased to be.

 

If I remember correctly (and I may be completely wrong here) the signals groups in Bomber and Fighter command had different roles, so i'm not sure if 60 group would have had a huge number of signals vehicles. Like I say, I'm going from memory and I'd need to double check to be sure.

 

As for the paints, i believe that there were orders at group level for camouflaging vehicles (building camouflaging was already underway) which is why it seems a mess in photos today, with some vehicles of the period camouflaged and others not. My working hypothesis is that those stations in the south and east were a priority for painting as they were the most vulnerable; however i have not had the chance to spend time at Kew and go through the papers there (oh for a week of leave to spend there!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Also Ted mentioned a Balloon Winch in SCC.2 Brown & Black disruptive camo, and here is one located in Kent at the time of the V1 attacks.

 

 

Larry remind me please ??

 

I don't think IWM colour shot is SCC 2. As its the pre MTP 46 pattern camo I think this is KG3 and dark Tarmac.

TED

Edited by ted angus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Ted, you may be right but as with these things the light or dark tone of the photo can change. Here is s slightly different version, which makes the G3 look browner. IMHO I was thinking that Black Camo was more common with SCC.2 Brown and also that Mickey Mouse (i.e. upper surfaces being dark) would not have suited an open wire mesh set up that's why they kept the mid war scheme in place. And what about the wheels are they G3?

RAF Balloon Winch June 1944.jpg

Edited by LarryH57
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I played with the tones etc, the colour on the wheel hub covers is also on the tyres so is it dust- or maybe mud residue ?? There was an air diagram detailing application of camo and markings , so I don't think patterns would be optional- once a repaint was deemed necessary then current regs would normally be followed re colour pattern etc, WE need to turn the clock back or alternatively find the regs for the early years I wish I could spend a week in london my first search would be ORBs during the transition to war period, then I would look at the N series AMOs; the earliest ref I have to RAF MT camo is in an N series.

So how many colours in the attached ??

 

TED

965 sqn 1crop.jpg

Edited by ted angus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Ted, I live close enough to NA Kew so I may visit, so what would the AMOs be under; some kind of AIR/ reference? I'd be more than happy to share what I find with you.

 

And BTW - your photos of Ford Sussex vehicles, is that the one taken in NW Europe? I cannot work out if they have the same camo scheme as in the colour photo above

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi Larry, the pic is late 1944 near Antwerp when they were trying to stop the slaughter in Antwerp caused by V weapons. I will try and see if I can find any TNA refs but I think the A series has been exhausted - I reckon N series prior to june 1941 is a starting point and Station ORBs for July to Dec 1939. TED

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Morning Bryan, , fingers crossed you find something : AMO N629 /41 dated 5 june 1941 stating Impressed vehicles to be camouflaged, but hire vehicles not to be; is my earliest . AMO A618 /41 dated 7 august 1941 my earliest - which details the use of KG3 etc. I rewatched a clip of the 1939 Aldergrove home movie last night and a bowser trailer and a Tilly type vehlcle were in a colour akin to KG 2 or the shade of SCC2. Good luck

TED

Edited by ted angus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Bryan & Ted,

 

Many thanks for the above. Is it more likely then that the AMOs will be in the TNA rather than RAF Museum? There would have been orders locked away for the station Commanders to open on the declaration of war, so what happened to them. I would have thought they were comparable for each RAF station within Bomber Command or Fighter Command with a few local variations, concernbing the colours and camo schemes. Seeing as aircraft received camo during the Munich Crisis and dispersal plans were put in place for Sqn in the East of england to re-locate to the west, it amazes me that the RAF vehicles didn't get the cam treatment at the same time.

 

Ted may I have the link to that film taken at aldergrove?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Firstly,

Larry here is a link to part of the film which can still be seen on the BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-26818893 they are in the first few seconds of the colour part. I am convinced cam of MT and other equipment would have been in the mobilisation orders, especially as the photographing evidence is now overwhelming. Not everything was in AMOs etc in the lead to gulf wars 1 & 2 our vehicle and GSE painting instructions were all contained in signals- the relevant APs were never amended to reflect and no higher level orders were published for open distribution ie DCIs etc.

 

Keith here attached is a scan of the original 1941 edition .

 

Matchfuzee , many thanks, Mike Starmer's work is great, but new stuff is regularly uncovered- he quotes RAF blue grey as formally being the RAF colour until AMO A618/41 was published, but with the unearthing of N629/41, the first mention found to date re RAF MT Camo can be advanced by 2 months .

 

TED

pages 1mtp-46-part-4a-painting-of-mechanical-transport.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Guys thanks for your contributions so far; I think we are making some progress but playing devils advocate, where is the proof that the War Office Pamphlets that have been attached were for the RAF?

 

I appreciate that if wartime manufacturers produced an order for a type of vehicle, that it would not have been practical to paint a few specially for the RAF if the majority were for the Army, so I can see the logic in the RAF following the War Office instructions, which is true once the war really got going. However its the period 1939-40 that is less certain and in need of some AMOs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
Guys thanks for your contributions so far; I think we are making some progress but playing devils advocate, where is the proof that the War Office Pamphlets that have been attached were for the RAF?

 

There is none Larry but its all part of a jigsaw The date on the original edition MTP 46 cover I posted tells us SCC 2 was in by that time and running alongside KG3.

TED

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Ted,  Its great to be back!

Anyway back to my question;  Was MTP46 actually for the RAF or is it the Army Camo instructions that we all assume were adopted by the RAF.  Well you suggest not, so where do I start if I was to go to the NA in Kew to find an AMO or similar that says "OK chaps, just follow the Army instructions" next time you paint a vehicle?

But then again if the RAF ordered a vehicle that was built on a line in a factory they would just have had to accept it in whatever colour it was in, so I might be looking for an order NOT to repaint vehicles? Obviously the above refers to wartime production and not the elusive AMO that requested RAF Blue be overpainted.

I live in NW London so I'd love to go digging in Kew but as a complete novice at TNA I'd need something to look for, reference wise.

Edited by LarryH57
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I will answer back to front, TNA not been there but you need the AIR files, they have an index on line search for mobilisation as my suggested starting point. 

Accept whatever was on the production line NO- Contracts were placed for the AM by the MoS , contracts specified spec qty. MoS instructed Contractors on current applicable schemes. 

colour etc  had to be specified because some of a contract might be for Middle east use whilst others for home / Europe use. 

 MTP 46 was a War Office publication. but we know from photo evidence we followed the Army lead, There is an Army poster re application of Camo plus correct positioning of markings, The RAF had a poster Air Diagram 1382 which defined camo schemes to be employed, but to date a copy has never been located.

 There might not have been an AMO instructing intro of camo, but it could have been a pre war secret letter that required its embodiment into unit/station war books / mobilisation procedures/orders - as I have stated previously For both GW 1 & 2 no DCI etc was issued  instructions came by confidential or restricted signals. -  Bryan Leggat is trawling the N series of AMO.  TED.

 

 

 

Edited by ted angus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Having exhausted A series (although i accept that i am only human and the possibility exists that I could have missed something)

There were pre-war orders in the SD series (secret document because the Air Ministry is so good at labels) that detail what to do on the outbreak of war but it's mostly organisational and higher level stuff. (also some interesting things like what to do in the event of unrest in Republic of Ireland amongst others). I can take a look through all of those as well when i get time.

Larry, the RAF Museum has an almost complete collection of AMOs in the A and N range (missing some very early stuff, the odd week in 1918 etc). It might be a case, as Ted says, of starting with a search on the TNA website for certain key words within the AIR series before you make your trip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I may have posted this image on the forum before. It is from the Ministry of Supply ledgers relating to Norton Solo motorcycle contract C9681. In  a note dated 19/3/1941, it states 'Accept 20 motorcycles finished in RAF blue grey - delivery already effected - all future machines to be Khaki Green No.3 as WD spec MC 205.

The main ledger states : "Delivery has been effected at works on behalf of A Ministry"

This may suggest that the changeover was not always as clean cut as it should have been. Did Norton make a mistake or chance their luck to use up stock parts and paint, or bearing in mind that they seem to have been collected from the factory,  did someone somewhere in the AM or RAF decide that they would have a small number in blue grey, perhaps for use in London or similar ?

 

C9891 (2).JPG

C9891 b (2).JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...