Jump to content

43rdrecce

Members
  • Content Count

    174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 43rdrecce

  1. Andrew, Couple of photos of a periscope brush which might be of use. Pretty simple items, dimensions should be obvious. Regards Paul
  2. Thanks both for the further information. The actual packaging is dated (on checking) December 1981 so slightly later than I'd remembered. As I say these will fit the WW2 Desmo type mirrors with a little trimming but as has been pointed out there were different makers. Thanks again Paul
  3. Excellent thanks very much. They are in 1970s packaging so figured something like that, but thanks for the confirmation. Cheers Paul
  4. I've done a quick NSN check but there is no detail as to the vehicle these were intended for. They will fit the old curved Desmo type mirrors though the corners need to be trimmed slightly. They are 3" x 6" Can anyone identify what the original usage was? 6MT3 2540 99 803 0599 Thanks Paul
  5. Yes, I do. Identical to the DPM in construction but made of a synthetic feeling cloth not windproof gabardine as on the DPM version. Most likely water resistant to a degree. Same quilted nylon lining too and khaki flannel lined side and brow flaps.Mine has RM rank insignia on the peak but the paper size label is long since gone. I suspect the crap hat and the ECW hat were originally copies of existing Norwegian designs but I've not confirmed that as yet. Features and design are near identical on both. Not sure what came first, the chicken or the egg! Regards Paul
  6. Though there was an early green British version of the CW cap, I believe the one in the photo is a Norwegian issue cap. These were commonly worn alongside UK manufactured versions. They are a distinctive shade and normally have a pale green tape binding on the edge of the peak. This one in the OP has had the Norge badge removed, but there are photos showing British troops wearing them complete with the original insignia as seen in the attached photo.
  7. Simon, The development files refer to it as the 1956 Pattern liner, though it does seem to have rarely been termed as such in later years. it's a murky period still and many of the introduction dates are vague to say the least. The trials process went on for ridiculous periods with some items. The official papers seem only to have survived in a confused and incomplete way. Collectors often refer to MkV helmets but I've never seen any official confirmation of this. It seems obvious that this nomenclature must have been applied to something, as we went from a MkIV helmet to a MkVI, and logic would suggest that a MkIV helmet with a 1956 Pattern liner might well have been intended as a MkV helmet, but the official confirmation just doesn't seem to be there. Many have looked in vain! i'm not exactly sure of when these were first introduced but 1957 may well be the start of production. Regards Paul
  8. And here the LAGR can't be anything other than the lightweight mask, due to the size of the haversack.
  9. Simon, Like you I've seen photos showing the MkVII haversacks. I was surprised to see these as they had officially not been an issue since the 1950s, though they must still have been in the system in large numbers. It is clear from some photos that I've seen that they appear to hold S6 masks. It may be that they were more convenient to wear in the alert position when carrying other kit than either the LAGR and Mk1 S6 Case. Here's one in use, seems to hold an S6 (which you'd expect at this date) judging by the shape, but difficult to be certain of course as the LAGR also had a side filter. Regards Paul
  10. Hello Lauren, Thanks for reply. Yes, the corners look slightly different. These are MW, but I'm sure I read somewhere that they are the same size. I have a few MW parts I don't require and I was wondering if these will actually fit any other type of 15cwt. regards Paul
  11. Will the Bedford MW screens (closed cab type) fit any of the other 15cwts? They look as though they might fit a Fordson, but will they fit anything else (I know they won't fit a Morris, wrong shape!) can anyone enlighten me? cheers Paul apologies if this has been asked before, did a search but couldn't find an answer
  12. There was an earlier A/6/CLO/ sequence running which pre-dates the A/78/ series I've seen it on 50s dated clothing. I've not seen enough of it to draw any conclusions however. regards Paul
  13. Ted, The pen holder sits inside the pocket. Just slide it along the cloth retainer and into the pocket. They were done away with as too costly later on. They were also fitted to flying coveralls. Some aircrew had Velcro patches sewn over the pocket to serve the same purpose. This jacket is also dated 1972, size 5 Cheers Paul
  14. Just had a quick look and yes, you will see this type on the Clinometers part of the Sighting and Gun-Laying equipment page. The top two both used to belong to me. They are very difficult to find especially number 2. Should bring decent money from a Vickers collector! Cheers Paul
  15. It's also one of several angle of sight instruments issued for use with Vickers MGs during WW1 until a dedicated MG clinometer was introduced in 1917/18 This type is shown alongside the Abney Level in many mid WW1 machine gun manuals. I had one in my collection of Vickers kit which is now in the care of Richard Fisher. Mine was by Troughton and Sims who seem to have been the major producer of these items along with JH Steward. Have a look at http://www.vickersmachinegun.org.uk I believe you may even see a photo of the one I used to own. My Vickers was L677 with all the WW1 bells and whistles which is also shown on there. Cheers Paul
  16. Thanks Clive, They are not the same as the wartime versions I have seen and I suspected they might be for a postwar vehicle. They may just be an upgraded version for earlier applications of course. Cheers Paul
  17. Can anyone identify this wiper motor and code and suggest which vehicle it may be for? The packaging date is November 1955 but it is very similar to those fitted to my Bedford MW, other than slight differences to the operating switch lever. The code is LV6/MT3 TF/KOB 224-1 on the packaging. On the motor is stencilled 415KOB224-1 Anyone know what they are for? I bought two as back up for WOTs and Bedford MW but not sure... Cheers Paul
  18. Thank you Maurice, Good old US standard parts! GeePig, you might be right there...Not much use to me and acquired by accident. Cheers Paul
  19. Hello all, I've found these NOS US gauges among some parts I bought a while back. Can anyone identify vehicles they would have been used on? I'm out of my comfort zone with US vehicles! Pretty sure the 80lbs Oil pressure gauge is of the type used on Universal Carriers, but what else? King Seeley Manufactured temp gauge Another 60-260 Temp gauge and a -100/+100 Amp gauge Can anyone help me identify what vehicles these were used on? Cheers Paul
  20. Paul, I guess in one sense you can see why. They were Airborne delivered Infantry, once dropped there was no need for a jump boot. I'm sure in those dark days of 1941 we couldn't afford fancy jump boots. Someone must have studied the number of drop zone injuries and come up with a big fat NO! Cheers Paul
  21. There were trial copies of German side-laced boots in the early days of the Parachute Regiment but they were not adopted. A high version of the standard ammo boot was trialled with an extra cuff with eyelets added to the top of the boot. They were also fitted with thick crepe rubber soles. Once again though trialled, they were not adopted. It can't have been a technical reason as the British shoe industry at the time was more than capable of producing quality boots. The reason must have been solely cost based and on perceived need. I guess the War Office felt the Parachute Regiment would have to make do with ammo boots and web anklets! Cheers Paul
  22. Well Wakefield's 'Special Clinic' certainly dealt with burning....but only in a certain part of the body!
  23. The smock shown has a field dressing pocket on the right arm. which does make it of post 84 manufacture. The material is a less reliable as a way of dating them. I also have examples where 'early' material was used after 1984! Some of the smaller scale producers seem to have had stocks for some time. Still a bloody good tenners worth though.... Regards Paul
×
×
  • Create New...